06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3<br />

Diagnosing presupposition in Sumerian<br />

To review somewhat, having identified a distributional class, the BNBV inal predicates, on<br />

the basis of a relatively simple diagnostic in chapter 1 (including an identification of the<br />

BNBV inal construction as a low source applicative along with the “transfer of possession”<br />

model that underlies low applicative semantics), chapter 2 sought to identify the type of<br />

lexical aspect coded by a low source applicative such as the BNBV inal predicates. In the<br />

end, the BNBV inal predicates were tentatively classified as achievements, which also<br />

explained two seemingly unrelated properties: (a) the reduplication of *bi-√ prefix verbs<br />

(switching to a larger group of data due to the virtual non-existence of reduplicated<br />

BNBV inal predicates) which seem to function as adverbial clauses of cause or result (due<br />

to the point-like aspectual profile of achievement predicates and the consequent inability<br />

of another event to co-occur with the point of transition) and (b) the non-agentive<br />

character of the zero-marked, absolutive case-marked noun immediately preceding a *bi-<br />

√ prefix verb (including so-called “transitive” verbs in which the patient is not affected<br />

by the event that the verb refers to, e.g., “Mary reached the summit”). Two consequences<br />

of chapter 2, which were somewhat unexpected (though predicted by the theoretical<br />

literature to some degree) lead us to the subject matter of this chapter: the point-like<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!