06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eduplicated Sumerian verbal form corresponding to the D-stem does not indicate the<br />

plurality of the direct object, but rather that the direct object is beaten to a point of<br />

completion: fulled cloth being cloth that has been beaten until it reaches a point at which<br />

it is fully cleansed and thickened. Thus the reduplication in this case contributes the<br />

adjectival values of “to be clean” and “to be thick.”<br />

(5) Nabnîtum J 331-342 (Finkel 1982 [MSL 16], 165; Yoshikawa 1993, 293;<br />

Molina and Such-Gutiérrez <strong>2004</strong>, 4)<br />

331. ze 2 ba-qa-mu to pluck<br />

332. ze 2.ze 2<br />

…<br />

(ba-qa-mu)<br />

342. ze 2.ze 2 bu-uq-qu-mu to pluck clean<br />

Here likewise, the reduplication of the verbal root does not seem to indicate plurality of<br />

the direct object, but rather a resultative which includes the adjectival meaning “to be<br />

clean,” yielding something like “(a sheep) plucked clean” as its resultative meaning. But<br />

as should be apparent from the distance between lines 331 and 342, the simple opposition<br />

envisioned by Yoshikawa is not so simple: while it is true that basic and reduplicated<br />

stems follow directly in lines 331 and 332, the blank space in the translation column of<br />

line 332 presumably indicates that it is to be translated with a G-stem Akkadian verb just<br />

like the non-reduplicated form in line 331; the D-stem reduplication occurs ten lines later<br />

and is not preceded by a non-reduplicated form. This seems to indicate that reduplicated<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!