06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.4 BNBV inal verbs of perception<br />

Bearing in mind the sometimes quite complicated distributional pattern of low source<br />

applicatives, especially those involving perception and (usually negative) affect, I turn<br />

initially to BNBV inal predicates that are verbs of direct perception.<br />

(29) Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta [1.8.2.3], ll. 551-554<br />

(Karahashi 2000, 119; Vanstiphout 2003, 88-89)<br />

551. gig ni 2.bi mu 2.a guru 7<br />

[x (x)] ka<br />

The wheat grown by itself . . . granary . . .,<br />

552. en aratta ki .ra As for that which was brought to the lord of<br />

mu.na.ni.in.≠ku 4±.[ku 4] Aratta,<br />

553. kisal aratta ki .a.ka igi.ni.ße 3<br />

i.im.dub ?<br />

It was piled up in front of him in the court of<br />

56<br />

Aratta,<br />

554. en aratta ki .ke 4 gig.e The lord of Aratta saw the wheat,<br />

igi bi 2.in.du 8<br />

The example of a BNBV inal predicate in line 554 is the one that appears at the beginning<br />

of the chapter as a prototypical example of a BNBV inal predicate. For a hint as to the<br />

reasoning behind my translation of line 552 as a topicalized relative clause, see the<br />

discussion of *mini-√ in chapter 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!