06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

topic and focus. This dissertation investigates the *bi-√ prefix as part of a larger effort to<br />

identify some of these basic morphosyntactic oppositions in the text-artifactual record of<br />

the Sumerian materials that originate from Old Babylonian Period (ca. 2000-1600 BCE)<br />

in Mesopotamia. I argue that the occurrence of a bare inalienable noun immediately to<br />

the left of a *bi-√ prefix verb forms a distinctive morphosyntactic construction which can<br />

be identified on the basis of both morphosyntactic and semantic critieria as a low source<br />

applicative construction.<br />

The identification of this subset of the occurrences of the *bi-√ prefix as a low<br />

source applicative construction has broad implications for other parts of Sumerian<br />

grammar, in particular, the development of ergativity in the language. The low source<br />

applicative construction is limited to a group of verbs that includes verbs of perception<br />

and adversity and can be juxtaposed to a type of causative construction in which a bare<br />

alienable noun occurs immediately to the left of the *bi-√ prefix. This opposition stems<br />

from the fact that, in the low source applicative construction, the ergative noun phrase is<br />

the possessor of the inalienable noun rather than the agent of the clause. In order to<br />

elucidate several possible correlations between the clausal possessive constructions<br />

underlying the use of the low source applicative and the development of ergativity,<br />

several other issues are also dealt with in considerable detail in the balance of the<br />

dissertation: the use of possessive pronominal suffixes to code definiteness and<br />

topicalization as well as the role of indefiniteness and the definiteness effect in verbs of<br />

perception, head-internal relative clauses and contrastive focus constructions.<br />

xvii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!