06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eduplicated stem is followed by the nominalizing/resultative suffix, *-a. There are many<br />

open research questions pertaining to the history of the Sumerian adjective that I will not<br />

attempt to address here, but it seems fairly clear that reduplication in the examples in this<br />

section does not indicate plurality of individuals as is typically assumed for ˙amt≥u<br />

reduplication. 17<br />

The types of verbal/adjectival reduplication dealt with in this section, therefore, stand<br />

in opposition to the use of verbal reduplication to indicate plurality, certain types of<br />

pluractionality, or (in the case of “reduced” reduplication) progressive/imperfective<br />

aspect. The simplest explanation for the opposition between the reduplicated forms dealt<br />

with in this section as opposed to the more familiar plural/pluractional forms is that the<br />

forms dealt with in this section are limited to secondary predicational, adverbial or<br />

backgrounding functions, whereas the plural and pluractional uses of reduplication can be<br />

associated with primary predication, verbal or foregrounding discursive functions. In<br />

terms of secondary predication in Sumerian (if that is in fact the proper explanation for<br />

the reduplicated forms dealt with in this section), we should bear in mind that other<br />

studies of reduplication have shown that the particular grammatical phenomena indicated<br />

by reduplication are often determined by the lexical aspectual class of the reduplicated<br />

verbal root in conjunction with the particular morphology of the reduplication or the<br />

morphosyntactic environment in which the reduplicated form occurs (see Edzard 1971;<br />

1972; 1976; Yoshikawa 1993, passim; Krecher 1995 for the morphological forms<br />

17 The use of reduplicated attributive adjectives such as gal.gal in diœir gal.gal.e.ne “the greatest gods” is probably<br />

related to diminuative/delimitative reduplication in that superlatives regularly pick out a limited number of referents<br />

(see Thomsen 2001 [1984], 65; for a brief overview of verbal reduplication in Mandarin and its similarities to the<br />

attenuative prefix /po-/ in Russian, see J. Kim 2003).<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!