06.04.2013 Views

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

Johnson 2004 - CDLI - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3) Ean. 11 2:9-3:4 (Jagersma forthcoming, 7/22)<br />

d nin.gir2.su.ra gir 2.su ki mu.na.du 3<br />

ningirsuk-ra girsu [mu] 4-[n] 5/6-[a] 7-√du<br />

PN-Dat GN Vent-Anim-Dat-build<br />

He built Girsu for Ningirsu<br />

(4) Gudea Cyl. A 18: 8-9 (Zólyomi 1999: 252)<br />

e 2.e im.ma.œen<br />

e-e [i] 2-[b] 5/6-[a] 7-√œen<br />

house-Dat Vent-Inan-Dat-go<br />

He went to the temple<br />

Note in particular the agreement between the nominal postposition in each example and<br />

the corresponding segment of the verbal prefix: (3) NP-ra = [n] 5/6-[a] 7 and (4) NP-e =<br />

[b] 5/6-[a] 7, where [n] 5/6 and [b] 5/6 are animate and inanimate respectively. 6 The paradigm of<br />

(singular) dative elements in the verbal prefix are as follows: 7<br />

6 The animate and inanimate elements in the verbal prefix are often assigned to distinct slots, [ ]6 and [ ] 5 respectively in<br />

the verbal prefix in order to solve several incongruities having to do with the verb, but in the constructions involving<br />

the type of verb that concerns us here, there is no reason to maintain the opposition. There is a great deal of<br />

disagreement about the number, segmentation and ordering of the verbal slots and the numbering used here is purely<br />

conventional, hence the notation [ ] 5/6.<br />

7 The form of the second person dative alternates between *mura-√ and *mara-√ but the latter is simply a case of<br />

assimilation and should not be confused with the first person dative prefix or necessarily associated with the second<br />

person dative affix itself.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!