10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12th Annual Conference © 2011 IAABD<br />

The table above shows that generic, social and personality skills are predicted by trait EI <strong>in</strong> that order <strong>of</strong><br />

importance. The table below presents regression results for <strong>the</strong> low and high trait student groups and<br />

shows that trait EI predicts employability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> high mean group, unlike <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low mean group<br />

Table 5: Employability as predicted by <strong>in</strong> low and high trait groups<br />

N R2 t B p<br />

High trait EI 109 .041 2.12 .201 .036**<br />

Low trait EI 73 .007 .706 .083 .482<br />

** Significant at 0.01 level 2 tailed<br />

Discussion<br />

First, this study utilizes data from two different sources hence <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> common method bias does<br />

not arise (Podsak<strong>of</strong>f et al., 2003). In phase one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study it is established that <strong>the</strong>re is no significant<br />

difference between women and men students <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir possession <strong>of</strong> non technical skills, consistent with<br />

Korabik and Aymen (1988) who argue that <strong>the</strong> socialization process makes men and women at <strong>the</strong> same<br />

level similar, thus HI was not supported. The scores <strong>of</strong> this sample <strong>of</strong> students on social skills were not<br />

very high (e.g. negotiat<strong>in</strong>g skills mean 3.96 and deal<strong>in</strong>g with conflict mean 3.70), and this is reflected<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> fact that supervisors were only satisfied by th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and personal skills. The fact that<br />

personal skills were important <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supervisors confirms that <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristics and<br />

behavior determ<strong>in</strong>e employability (Clarke, 2007). Correlation analysis shows that th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g skills<br />

(cognitive) are orthogonal to trait emotional <strong>in</strong>telligence, (p>.05) as expected. In this study <strong>the</strong> reason<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is that problem solv<strong>in</strong>g skills as well as creativity and <strong>in</strong>novation are factors that border on <strong>the</strong> cognitive<br />

side, and may not depend on how a person relates to o<strong>the</strong>rs or recognizes <strong>the</strong>ir emotions. Thus go<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

this analysis, it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that trait emotional <strong>in</strong>telligence is not correlated with th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g skills.<br />

Unlike Mavroveli et al. (2007), phase two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study establishes that women students have a higher<br />

level <strong>of</strong> emotional <strong>in</strong>telligence than men students (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!