10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12th Annual Conference © 2011 IAABD<br />

That is <strong>the</strong> case we have with some <strong>of</strong> our operatives; because if you take someone who can’t read and<br />

write it is difficult to <strong>in</strong>troduce new technologies to <strong>the</strong>m (Quantity Surveyor Consultant with western<br />

experience).<br />

Some respondents also po<strong>in</strong>ted out that because some construction firms were run by non-pr<strong>of</strong>essionals,<br />

illiterates or semi-literates. The knowledge base was not right:<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> h<strong>in</strong>drances to technology transfer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> Ghana is that most<br />

contractors are non-pr<strong>of</strong>essionals or illiterates. How can you transfer technology when <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />

base is not right? (Consultant Civil Eng<strong>in</strong>eer).<br />

Most respondents po<strong>in</strong>ted out that whilst <strong>the</strong> knowledge base among local consultants was good, <strong>the</strong> same<br />

cannot be said for <strong>the</strong> local contract<strong>in</strong>g subsector as it was dom<strong>in</strong>ated by illiterates and non-pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

One local consultant who works with a foreign firm observed that:<br />

“I don’t know whe<strong>the</strong>r it is <strong>the</strong> way we were tra<strong>in</strong>ed, but people [local consultants] don’t come out to<br />

s<strong>in</strong>g and dance about <strong>the</strong>mselves and what <strong>the</strong>y know, but when you get to talk to <strong>the</strong>m, th<strong>in</strong>gs that<br />

suddenly come up that <strong>the</strong>y know... it’s amaz<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

In l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> this study, what needs to be looked <strong>in</strong>to fur<strong>the</strong>r is how government policy<br />

can ensure that adequate knowledge transfer precede technology transfer. In this regard, <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong><br />

need to review tertiary education and Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development (CPD) for pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

bodies. There is also <strong>the</strong> need to review processes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> draft<strong>in</strong>g construction contracts.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies and <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>in</strong>dustry should play an active role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human resource<br />

development with<strong>in</strong> tertiary <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

Discussion<br />

Technology may be viewed as hav<strong>in</strong>g hard elements (Construction outputs/build<strong>in</strong>gs, materials, plant &<br />

equipment – product technology); s<strong>of</strong>t elements (skills, knowledge, organisation – management<br />

technology); <strong>the</strong> process technology as described by Grosse (1996) comb<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> product technology with<br />

<strong>the</strong> managerial technology to produce outputs (which is part <strong>of</strong> product technology). These processes<br />

require cont<strong>in</strong>uous flow and utilisation <strong>of</strong> data and <strong>in</strong>formation which <strong>in</strong> itself is knowledge.<br />

Technology <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> person-embodied component (more tacit knowledge), <strong>the</strong> processembodied;<br />

which is viewed as be<strong>in</strong>g embedded <strong>in</strong> equipment, tools, techniques, systems, processes,<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation (more explicit knowledge). Technology and knowledge go hand <strong>in</strong> hand, but for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries <strong>the</strong> knowledge base should match <strong>the</strong> technology be<strong>in</strong>g transferred. Not all technology is based<br />

on a mach<strong>in</strong>e or equipment, some <strong>of</strong> it is based <strong>in</strong> people. This means that <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> need to encapsulate<br />

<strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> knowledge clearly to appreciate <strong>the</strong> technology concept.<br />

Li-Hua (2004) observed that TT and KT go hand <strong>in</strong> hand. He is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> view that knowledge transfer can<br />

occur without technology transfer, but without knowledge transfer <strong>the</strong>re can be no technology transfer.<br />

Li-Hua’s assertion that knowledge transfer can take place without technology transfer may be open to<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r debate. This is because <strong>the</strong> KM literature and <strong>the</strong> responses <strong>in</strong> this study reveal that technology<br />

and knowledge have <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly become <strong>in</strong>separable. It has become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult to f<strong>in</strong>d an<br />

effective and efficient KM system devoid <strong>of</strong> ICT (technology) support; <strong>of</strong> course technology is <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> knowledge. Carrillo et al. (2006) and Patel et al. (2000) noted <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> IT <strong>in</strong> KM. Wiig<br />

(2000) noted that one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key driv<strong>in</strong>g forces <strong>of</strong> KM is technology. This demonstrates that effective KM<br />

requires <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> technology and knowledge. This paper posits that for effective T&K<br />

management and transfer, technology and knowledge are <strong>in</strong>separable. What <strong>the</strong>se responses appear to<br />

encapsulate is that <strong>the</strong> knowledge that is acquired through education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (more explicit <strong>in</strong> nature)<br />

is <strong>the</strong> foundation (that which prepares <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual) for effective transfer <strong>of</strong> product, process and<br />

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!