10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Era</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Globalization</strong><br />

Edited by Emmanuel Obuah<br />

only as directly <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g employee perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HF but also mediat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />

POJ and HF.<br />

This study contributes to <strong>the</strong> literature <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g ways: (1). it explore <strong>the</strong> antecedents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HF <strong>in</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g economies environments <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia; (2) it extends <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

organizational behavior issues at <strong>the</strong> workplace <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g economies to <strong>the</strong> sub-Saharan African<br />

context (Ghana), and explore how it affects <strong>the</strong> HF when compared with an Asian context – India; and (3)<br />

it focus on MC, a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> support <strong>the</strong>y receive from <strong>the</strong>ir organizations and <strong>the</strong>ir commitment<br />

to <strong>the</strong> organization, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> organizational support and commitment separately, and exam<strong>in</strong>es how MC<br />

mediates <strong>the</strong> relationship between POJ and HF.<br />

The Socio-Cultural Context <strong>of</strong> Ghana and India<br />

Although Ghana and India are both emerg<strong>in</strong>g economies, <strong>the</strong>y are relatively different from one ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

from an economic and socio-cultural perspective. They, thus present <strong>the</strong> diversity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic and<br />

socio-cultural environments needed to exam<strong>in</strong>e employees’ perception <strong>of</strong> POJ, MC and <strong>the</strong> HF. Ghana is<br />

a relatively small country <strong>in</strong> West Africa with a population <strong>of</strong> about 24.3 million people (2010 estimate),<br />

real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate <strong>of</strong> 4.1% (2009 estimate), and a GDP per capita <strong>of</strong><br />

US$1500.00 (Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 2010a). Ghana is seen as a model country and a<br />

budd<strong>in</strong>g success story <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa with regards to <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> its economic reforms. India,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, is <strong>the</strong> second most populous country <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world with a population <strong>of</strong> about 1.17<br />

billion people (2010 estimate). India is also one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g economies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world and second<br />

only to Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> Asia with a 2009 estimated real GDP growth rate <strong>of</strong> 7.4% and a GDP per capita <strong>of</strong><br />

US$3100.00 (CIA, 2010b).<br />

The socio-cultural values <strong>of</strong> a nation <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> perceptions and work-related behaviors <strong>of</strong> employees.<br />

Although, both Ghana and India are multicultural and multi-ethnic societies, <strong>the</strong> cultural differences<br />

between Ghana and India could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by H<strong>of</strong>stede’s (1980) national cultural dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividualism-collectivism, power distance, uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance, and mascul<strong>in</strong>ity-fem<strong>in</strong>ism. It has been<br />

argued that <strong>the</strong> socio-cultural values <strong>of</strong> a society that is embedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualism-collectivism and<br />

power distance <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> work culture <strong>of</strong> organizations and work-related behaviors <strong>of</strong> employees<br />

(Mendonca and Kanungo, 1994). H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980) <strong>in</strong>cluded India and West Africa (Ghana, Nigeria, and<br />

Sierra Leone) <strong>in</strong> his sample <strong>of</strong> nations. H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980) classified <strong>the</strong> West Africa region as high on<br />

collectivism, high on power distance, medium to high on uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance, and medium to high on<br />

mascul<strong>in</strong>ity. Indeed, Ghana is a nation with strong traditional and cultural values. The traditional society<br />

which is collectivistic is characterized by a deeply imbedded communal bond and <strong>in</strong>terpersonal relations.<br />

Moreover, it is a male-dom<strong>in</strong>ated and hierarchical society with high levels <strong>of</strong> both mascul<strong>in</strong>ity and power<br />

distance. Status, prestige, and position are important; and respect for seniority, authority, hierarchy and<br />

<strong>the</strong> elderly are exacted (Gyekye and Salm<strong>in</strong>en, 2009). Thus, <strong>the</strong> work environment <strong>in</strong> Ghana is<br />

characterized by hierarchical structures, high levels <strong>of</strong> centralization, gender <strong>in</strong>equality, submission to<br />

authority and seniority, and low levels <strong>of</strong> delegation and <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g (Gyekye and<br />

Salm<strong>in</strong>en, 2009).<br />

H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980) fur<strong>the</strong>r classified India’s national culture as be<strong>in</strong>g medium on collectivism, high on<br />

power distance, low on uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance and high on mascul<strong>in</strong>ity. Thus, extant cross-cultural<br />

management research have argued that India national culture is complex and is a “cultural island”<br />

because, as a high power distance nation, it should be clustered with strong uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance nations,<br />

but it is low on uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance (Mathur et al., 2001). The traditional social structure <strong>of</strong> India is also<br />

considered to be hierarchical <strong>in</strong> nature and it is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by religion (e.g., H<strong>in</strong>duism and Buddhism) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> caste system, and emphasizes respect for superiors and authority figures such as elders, supervisors,<br />

and managers (Budhwar et al., 2008). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Indian culture places a strong emphasis on<br />

465

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!