10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Era</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Globalization</strong><br />

Edited by Emmanuel Obuah<br />

was to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical methods used to measure efficiency, data used, models specified,<br />

sensitivity analysis employed, validity and robustness <strong>of</strong> techniques, results obta<strong>in</strong>ed and policy<br />

implications. In terms <strong>of</strong> methods used to measure efficiency, Holl<strong>in</strong>gsworth found that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

technique used is <strong>the</strong> non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In fact up to 1997, he found that<br />

two thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies used DEA models alone and about one fifth used DEA along with regressions<br />

analysis. His f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were similar <strong>in</strong> 2003 where about 50% used DEA alone and about a quarter used a<br />

two stage analysis with DEA and regression analysis. Although more complex analysis, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Malmquist Index are be<strong>in</strong>g used, <strong>the</strong> non parametric DEA technique has been by far <strong>the</strong><br />

most frequently used ma<strong>the</strong>matical technique to measure efficiency <strong>in</strong> healthcare. He also found that <strong>the</strong><br />

studies focus on technical ra<strong>the</strong>r than allocative efficiency. Moreover, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coelli et al. (2005),<br />

DEA is greatly preferred <strong>in</strong> efficiency analysis <strong>in</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>it sector such as health <strong>in</strong>stitutions because<br />

random noise is less <strong>of</strong> a problem, multiple <strong>in</strong>puts are used and multiple outputs are produced. Also price<br />

data are difficult to f<strong>in</strong>d and sett<strong>in</strong>g up a production function is difficult. Data Envelopment Analysis<br />

def<strong>in</strong>es efficiency as <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> how much output is achieved <strong>in</strong> relation to how much <strong>in</strong>put is used.<br />

More output for <strong>the</strong> same <strong>in</strong>put achieves greater efficiency as does produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same output for less<br />

<strong>in</strong>put. S<strong>in</strong>ce its development by Charnes et al. (1978), <strong>the</strong> DEA has been widely applied to non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

organizations. DEA uses L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g to establish <strong>the</strong> efficiency frontier from a sample data. The<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> a DMU is <strong>the</strong>n measured relative to <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, subject to <strong>the</strong><br />

restriction that all DMUs lie on or below <strong>the</strong> frontier (Bjurek et al. 1990). The orig<strong>in</strong>al DEA ma<strong>the</strong>matical<br />

model was proposed by Charnes et al. (1978).The proposed fractional programm<strong>in</strong>g model is replaced<br />

with an equivalent l<strong>in</strong>ear programm<strong>in</strong>g formulation through a series <strong>of</strong> transformations (Charnes et al.,<br />

1978). Efficiency can ei<strong>the</strong>r be characterized with an <strong>in</strong>put orientation or an output orientation. In this<br />

study we will consider <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put orientation (Djerdjouri et al., 2007). For <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put oriented model a<br />

decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g unit (DMU) is not efficient <strong>in</strong> utiliz<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>in</strong>puts to produce given amounts <strong>of</strong> output if it<br />

can be shown that some o<strong>the</strong>r DMU or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> DMUs can produce <strong>the</strong> same amount <strong>of</strong> output<br />

with less <strong>of</strong> some resource (<strong>in</strong>put) and no more <strong>of</strong> any o<strong>the</strong>r resource. Conversely, a DMU is efficient if<br />

this is not possible. The l<strong>in</strong>ear programm<strong>in</strong>g model is formulated as:<br />

[VRS]: M<strong>in</strong>imize E (1)<br />

Subject to: WX ≤ EX0 (2)<br />

WY ≥ Y0 (3)<br />

WI = 1 (4)<br />

W ≥ 0 (5)<br />

where X and Y are <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put and output matrices, respectively; X0 and Y0 are <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put and output vectors,<br />

respectively for <strong>the</strong> DMU be<strong>in</strong>g assessed; W is a vector represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> weights (%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts and<br />

outputs <strong>of</strong> DMUs used <strong>in</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g a composite DMU; and E is <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>in</strong>dex. If <strong>the</strong> optimal<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model gives E=1, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> test DMU is relatively efficient and if E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!