10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Era</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Globalization</strong><br />

Edited by Emmanuel Obuah<br />

subject or <strong>in</strong>itiative enhances <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> that particular <strong>in</strong>itiative becom<strong>in</strong>g popular on local leaders’<br />

agenda. The estimated coefficient for <strong>the</strong> knowledge variable is positive and statistically significant. The<br />

estimated change <strong>in</strong> probability coefficient (0.529) suggests that those local economic development<br />

leaders who are knowledgeable about agriculture value-added <strong>in</strong>itiatives are 53 percent more likely to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g value-added bus<strong>in</strong>esses to <strong>the</strong>ir local areas than <strong>the</strong>ir counterparts.<br />

Table 4. Estimated Results<br />

Variable B S.E. t-value Sig. ∆ Prob.<br />

Constant -2.040* 0.820 -2.487 0.013 -0.870<br />

Age 0.571* 0.279 2.044 0.052 0.069<br />

Gender -0.022 0.655 -0.034 0.973 -0.022<br />

Education 0.996 0.593 1.681 0.093 0.708<br />

Knowledge 0.425* 0.138 3.084 0.002 0.529<br />

Location -0.131 0.329 -0.399 0.690 -0.123<br />

Local jobs 0.390 0.327 1.193 0.233 0.477<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it Marg<strong>in</strong> 0.831* 0.258 3.223 0.001 0.296<br />

Predicted 76.600<br />

-Log likelihood 310.605<br />

Chi-square 98.806<br />

Nagelkerke R-Square 0.377<br />

Sample size 154<br />

*, denotes significance at 5 percent or higher level<br />

Of all local leaders’ concerns, those who put greater importance on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ pr<strong>of</strong>it marg<strong>in</strong><br />

were more likely to be <strong>in</strong>volved with br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g value-added enterprises to <strong>the</strong>ir communities. Respondents<br />

to whom <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ pr<strong>of</strong>it marg<strong>in</strong> was important were 30 percent more likely to br<strong>in</strong>g valueadded<br />

enterprises to <strong>the</strong>ir communities. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong> variables measur<strong>in</strong>g concerns about local jobs<br />

was not statistically significant at <strong>the</strong> five percent level or higher, imply<strong>in</strong>g that, <strong>the</strong>se concerns are not<br />

important <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g local economic development leaders’ <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g value-added<br />

enterprises to <strong>the</strong>ir regions. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> estimated coefficients for <strong>the</strong> demographic variables (age and<br />

gender) and location are <strong>in</strong>significant.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper was to exam<strong>in</strong>e attributes <strong>of</strong> local economic development leaders’<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement with agriculture value-added <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> Alabama. The analysis was based on data<br />

collected us<strong>in</strong>g a web-based questionnaire that was sent to 367 local leaders <strong>of</strong> whom 154 responded. The<br />

average respondent surveyed was male, 50 years old, has a college degree and represents a metropolitan<br />

county. In terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key concerns, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g more jobs to <strong>the</strong> local areas was identified as <strong>the</strong> key<br />

followed by <strong>the</strong> desire to promote rural development. Notably, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> local leader were concern<br />

about <strong>the</strong> up br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area as a whole <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual farmers benefit<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> push for value<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives. Cross tabulation results revealed that female local economic leaders with a college<br />

education who were 50 years or older had participated more <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g value-added enterprises to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

regions than <strong>the</strong>ir counterparts.<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!