10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Era</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Globalization</strong><br />

Edited by Emmanuel Obuah<br />

variable measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> fish harvested <strong>in</strong>creases pr<strong>of</strong>itability. O<strong>the</strong>r variables <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hir<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

pond manager, membership to a farmer group, access to extension services, record keep<strong>in</strong>g, average pond<br />

size and number <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>gerl<strong>in</strong>gs have no significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Table 3: Factor Affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Fish Production <strong>in</strong> Central Uganda<br />

Dependent variable = Pr<strong>of</strong>it (US$)<br />

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-value<br />

Constant -2.526 1.59 -1.59<br />

Average pond size (m 2 ) -0.041 0.11 -0.37<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>gerl<strong>in</strong>gs stocked -0.087 0.10 -.85<br />

Hir<strong>in</strong>g a pond manager = 1, 0 o<strong>the</strong>rwise 0.049 0.20 0.25<br />

Membership to a farmer group=1, 0 o<strong>the</strong>rwise 0.249 0.28 0.90<br />

Access to extension services=1, 0 o<strong>the</strong>rwise 0.174 0.23 0.76<br />

Record keep<strong>in</strong>g (1=yes, 0 o<strong>the</strong>rwise) 0.011 0.22 0.05<br />

Fish farm<strong>in</strong>g experience (years) 0.334** 0.13 2.57<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> fish harvested 0.968*** 0.13 7.36<br />

Average price <strong>of</strong> a unit <strong>of</strong> fish (US$) 1.007*** 0.21 4.75<br />

Average size <strong>of</strong> fish harvested (kgs) 0.273** 0.14 1.92<br />

Adjusted R 2 = 0.768<br />

F-Statistic = 22.87***<br />

***, and ** are significant levels at 1% and 5% respectively<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ts Fac<strong>in</strong>g Fish Farmers<br />

Fish farmers reported many constra<strong>in</strong>ts dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fish production process. Fish predators were reported<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> most serious constra<strong>in</strong>t to fish production as reported by 51 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents (Table 4).<br />

Many farmers were found not to protect <strong>the</strong>ir fish thus <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> predators that ranged from birds, to<br />

snakes and o<strong>the</strong>r wild animals. Scarcity <strong>of</strong> feeds came second as ano<strong>the</strong>r serious constra<strong>in</strong>t lead<strong>in</strong>g to high<br />

cost. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> agreement with <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Ocmer (2006) and Ugwumba and Chukwuji (2010)<br />

that reported high cost <strong>of</strong> feeds as a very serious constra<strong>in</strong>t to fish production. The o<strong>the</strong>r constra<strong>in</strong>t that<br />

seriously affected <strong>the</strong> farmers was lack <strong>of</strong> capital. Fish farm<strong>in</strong>g is a capital <strong>in</strong>tensive enterprise thus<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g big capital <strong>in</strong>vestment for reasonable pr<strong>of</strong>it to be made (Ugwumba and Chukwuji, 2010). This<br />

could expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reason why more than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents (66 percent) had less than three ponds.<br />

Poor quality f<strong>in</strong>gerl<strong>in</strong>gs were ano<strong>the</strong>r serious problem fac<strong>in</strong>g farmers as reported by 22 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

farmers. Many farmers compla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong> poor f<strong>in</strong>gerl<strong>in</strong>gs which <strong>in</strong> some cases did not grow to <strong>the</strong> farmers<br />

expectations. This result supports <strong>the</strong> earlier f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Isyagi (2007) that established that a third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

farmers considered access to fish seed as a serious constra<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!