10.12.2012 Views

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

Challenges in the Era of Globalization - iaabd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12th Annual Conference © 2011 IAABD<br />

company accru<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>, derived from, brought <strong>in</strong>to or received <strong>in</strong> Nigeria <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> all k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come;<br />

that is <strong>in</strong>come derived from a trade, bus<strong>in</strong>ess or <strong>in</strong>vestments. The Act places obligations on corporate<br />

taxpayers based on <strong>the</strong> arrangements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir formation, <strong>the</strong>ir type <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess activity and <strong>the</strong>ir location.<br />

Four broad categories <strong>of</strong> obligations however exist for almost all corporate taxpayers namely: registration<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system; timely fil<strong>in</strong>g or lodgement <strong>of</strong> requisite taxation <strong>in</strong>formation; report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> complete and<br />

accurate <strong>in</strong>formation (<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g good record keep<strong>in</strong>g); and timely payment <strong>of</strong> tax obligations<br />

(Baiyewu, 2000). For <strong>the</strong>ir part, taxpayers have an important role to play <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se obligations, as<br />

<strong>in</strong> many situations, it is only <strong>the</strong>y who are <strong>in</strong> a position to know that <strong>the</strong>y may have an obligation under<br />

<strong>the</strong> law (OECD, 2004).<br />

Many studies not<strong>in</strong>g a substantial tax gap between what is collectable and what is actually collected <strong>in</strong><br />

taxes have suggested lack <strong>of</strong> voluntary compliance by current and potential taxpayers as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

reasons for <strong>the</strong> tax gap (Oberholzer, 2008, Richardson & Sawyer, 2000; Long & Sw<strong>in</strong>gen, 1988; OECD,<br />

2004). Such studies have attempted to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> noncompliance attitude <strong>of</strong> tax payers to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

obligations from different perspectives. From <strong>the</strong> economic rationality perspectives, such factors as <strong>the</strong><br />

tax complexity, cost <strong>of</strong> compliance (amount <strong>of</strong> tax owed) were identified as factors which shape <strong>the</strong><br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> taxpayers (Etzioni 1986 Richardson & Sawyer, 2000; Long & Sw<strong>in</strong>gen, 1988; OECD,<br />

2004).<br />

From <strong>the</strong> behavioural perspective, factors that have been used to expla<strong>in</strong> tax payers’ attitude <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> fairness <strong>in</strong> collection procedures and perception <strong>of</strong> fairness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way tax revenue is<br />

utilized. Ritsema et al. (2003), found taxpayers’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fairness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tax system as likely<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence on will<strong>in</strong>gness to evade payment. Thurman et al. (1984) and Richardson and Sawyer (2000)<br />

also explored justice concerns on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not citizens receive <strong>the</strong> goods and services <strong>the</strong>y believe <strong>the</strong>y<br />

deserve given <strong>the</strong> taxes that <strong>the</strong>y pay. Wenzel (2002) and Coleman et al. (2001) noted that perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

unfair treatment were reputed to be rife among <strong>the</strong> small bus<strong>in</strong>ess community <strong>in</strong> Australia who <strong>the</strong><br />

Australian Taxation Office (1996) noted to express strong resentment aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> tax system. Noble<br />

(2000) and Tan and Veal (2003) also raised fairness issues <strong>in</strong> relation to adm<strong>in</strong>istration and tax levels <strong>in</strong><br />

New Zealand. Etzioni (1986) concluded that tax evasion is l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> tax unfairness <strong>in</strong> public<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion (1960-1980), even when tax rates rema<strong>in</strong> unchanged for <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>of</strong> America.<br />

Apart from <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> fairness, taxpayers’ attitudes are also argued to be learned and <strong>in</strong> some way<br />

affected by experience and knowledge (Lewis, 1982). Butress<strong>in</strong>g this argument, Peters (cited <strong>in</strong><br />

Oberholzer, 2008, p.65) noted that citizens do on <strong>the</strong> whole like <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>the</strong>y receive from<br />

government and tend to be much more will<strong>in</strong>g to pay taxes when rem<strong>in</strong>ded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefits received as a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so, thus provid<strong>in</strong>g support for <strong>the</strong> suggestion that tax knowledge will affect <strong>the</strong><br />

attitude <strong>of</strong> tax payers. Eriksen and Falian (1996) reported significant changes <strong>in</strong> attitudes towards taxation<br />

from tax course exposure. Increas<strong>in</strong>g tax knowledge <strong>of</strong> taxpayers is an important function <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration (OECD, 2004; Tanzi & Pellechio, 1995). Tax adm<strong>in</strong>istration’s effectiveness is <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

expected to result <strong>in</strong> high level <strong>of</strong> knowledge among tax payers which should <strong>in</strong> turn result <strong>in</strong> a higher<br />

level <strong>of</strong> compliance.<br />

Model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Study<br />

It is from <strong>the</strong> behavioural perspective that this study exam<strong>in</strong>es impacts on taxpayers’ attitude to<br />

compliance with tax laws. The study proposes relationships among four groups <strong>of</strong> variables namely;<br />

Perception <strong>of</strong> Tax Adm<strong>in</strong>istration structures and procedures; Perception <strong>of</strong> governance; and Tax payers’<br />

knowledge as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent variables and <strong>the</strong> Compliance Attitude <strong>of</strong> taxpayers as <strong>the</strong> dependent<br />

variable. The study argues that poor compliance attitude by <strong>the</strong> Company <strong>in</strong>come taxpayers <strong>in</strong> Nigeria is<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced to a higher extent by <strong>the</strong> high perception <strong>of</strong> tax payers about <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> accountability and<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!