22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

household returns on peasant farming will be unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

so long as peasant “industries” are not classified according <strong>to</strong><br />

their economic types, so long as among the “industrialists”<br />

employers are not separated from wage-workers. This is the<br />

minimum number <strong>of</strong> economic types without discriminating<br />

between which economic statistics cannot be regarded as<br />

satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry. A more detailed classification is, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

desirable; for example; proprie<strong>to</strong>rs employing wage-workers—proprie<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

not employing wage-workers—traders,<br />

buyers-up, shopkeepers, etc., artisans, meaning industrialists<br />

who work for cus<strong>to</strong>mers, etc.<br />

Coming back <strong>to</strong> our table, let us observe that after all we<br />

had some right <strong>to</strong> consider “industries” as being the sale <strong>of</strong><br />

labour-power, for it is usually wage-workers who predominate<br />

among peasant “industrialists.” If it were possible <strong>to</strong> single<br />

the wage-workers out <strong>of</strong> the latter, we would, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

obtain an incomparably smaller percentage <strong>of</strong> “industrialists”<br />

in the <strong>to</strong>p groups.<br />

As <strong>to</strong> the data regarding wage-workers, we must note here<br />

the absolutely mistaken character <strong>of</strong> Mr. Kharizomenov’s<br />

opinion that the “short-term hire [<strong>of</strong> workers] for reaping,<br />

mowing and day labouring, which is <strong>to</strong>o widespread a phenomenon,<br />

cannot serve as a characteristic criterion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strength or weakness <strong>of</strong> a farm” (p. 46 <strong>of</strong> “Introduction” <strong>to</strong><br />

the Combined Returns). Theoretical considerations, the<br />

example <strong>of</strong> Western Europe, and the facts <strong>of</strong> Russia (dealt<br />

with below) compel us, on the contrary, <strong>to</strong> regard the hiring<br />

<strong>of</strong> day labourers as a very characteristic feature <strong>of</strong> the rural<br />

bourgeoisie.<br />

Lastly, as regards rented land, the data show, here <strong>to</strong>o, the<br />

same concentration <strong>of</strong> it in the hands <strong>of</strong> the peasant bourgeoisie.<br />

Let us note that the combined tables <strong>of</strong> the Sara<strong>to</strong>v statisticians<br />

do not show the number <strong>of</strong> peasants who rent land<br />

and lease it out, but only the <strong>to</strong>tal land rented and leased<br />

out*; we have, therefore, <strong>to</strong> determine the amount <strong>of</strong> land<br />

rented and leased per existing, and not per renting<br />

household.<br />

* The <strong>to</strong>tal amount <strong>of</strong> arable leased out in the uyezd is 61,639<br />

dess., i.e., about 6, <strong>of</strong> the aggregate allotment arable (377,305 dess.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!