22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

543<br />

And so on and so forth. It would be interesting <strong>to</strong> see how,<br />

in these and similar cases, the Narodnik economists would<br />

determine where “artificial” capitalism begins and<br />

“people’s” industry ends.<br />

The three main forms <strong>of</strong> industry enumerated above differ<br />

first <strong>of</strong> all in their systems <strong>of</strong> technique. Small commodityproduction<br />

is characterised by its <strong>to</strong>tally primitive, hand<br />

technique that remained unchanged almost from time<br />

immemorial. The small producer in industry remains a peasant<br />

who follows tradition in his methods <strong>of</strong> processing raw material.<br />

Manufacture introduces division <strong>of</strong> labour, which effects<br />

a substantial change in technique and transforms the peasant<br />

in<strong>to</strong> a fac<strong>to</strong>ry-hand, a “labourer performing one detailed<br />

operation.” But production by hand remains, and, on its basis,<br />

progress in methods <strong>of</strong> production is inevitably very slow.<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> labour springs up spontaneously and is passed on<br />

by tradition just as peasant labour is. Large-scale machine<br />

industry alone introduces a radical change, throws manual<br />

skill overboard, transforms production on new, rational<br />

principles, and systematically applies science <strong>to</strong> production.<br />

So long as capitalism in Russia did not organise large-scale<br />

machine industry, and in those industries in which it has<br />

not done so yet, we see almost complete stagnation in technique,<br />

we see the employment <strong>of</strong> the same hand-loom and<br />

the same watermill or windmill that were used in production<br />

centuries ago. On the other hand, in industries subordinated<br />

<strong>to</strong> the fac<strong>to</strong>ry we observe a complete technical revolution<br />

and extremely rapid progress in the methods <strong>of</strong> machine<br />

production.<br />

We see that the different stages <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong><br />

capitalism are connected with different systems <strong>of</strong> technique.<br />

Small commodity-production and manufacture are<br />

characterised by the prevalence <strong>of</strong> small establishments,<br />

from among which only a few large ones emerge. Large-scale<br />

machine industry completely eliminates the small<br />

establishments. Capitalist relationships arise in the small<br />

industries <strong>to</strong>o (in the form <strong>of</strong> workshops employing wageworkers<br />

and <strong>of</strong> merchant’s capital), but these are still poorly<br />

developed and are not crystallised in sharp oppositions<br />

between the groups participating in production. Neither<br />

big capital nor extensive proletarian strata as yet exist.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!