22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

allotment and purchased land—for 66.3% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal rented<br />

arable (Returns for Meli<strong>to</strong>pol Uyezd, p. B. 190-194). On the<br />

other hand, 40% <strong>of</strong> the households, the poor ones (those with<br />

up <strong>to</strong> 10 dess. under crops), comprising 30.1 % <strong>of</strong> the peasant<br />

population, account—despite the fact that they are worst<br />

provided with allotment and purchased land—for 5.6% <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>to</strong>tal rented arable. As can be seen, this closely resembles<br />

“equal per-capita distribution”!<br />

Mr. Maress bases all his calculations <strong>of</strong> peasant land-renting<br />

on the “assumption” that “the renting households are mainly<br />

in the two groups worst provided” (provided with allotment<br />

land; that “among the renting population there is equal percapita<br />

(sic!) distribution <strong>of</strong> rented land”; and that “the renting<br />

<strong>of</strong> land enables the peasants <strong>to</strong> pass from the groups<br />

worst provided <strong>to</strong> those best provided” (34-35). We have<br />

already shown that all these “assumptions” <strong>of</strong> Mr. Maress<br />

directly contradict the facts. Actually, the very contrary is the<br />

case, as Mr. Maress could not but have noted, had he—in<br />

dealing with inequalities in economic life (p. 35)—taken<br />

the data for the classification <strong>of</strong> households according <strong>to</strong> economic<br />

indices (instead <strong>of</strong> according <strong>to</strong> allotment tenure),<br />

and not limited himself <strong>to</strong> the unfounded “assumption” <strong>of</strong><br />

Narodnik prejudices.<br />

Let us now compare Kamyshin Uyezd with other uyezds<br />

in Sara<strong>to</strong>v Gubernia. The ratios between the peasant groups<br />

are everywhere the same, as is shown by the following data<br />

for the four uyezds (<strong>Vol</strong>sk, Kuznetsk, Balashov and Serdobsk)<br />

in which, as we have said, the middle and the well-<strong>to</strong>-do peasants<br />

are combined:<br />

Groups <strong>of</strong> householders<br />

Four uyezds in Sara<strong>to</strong>v Gubernia<br />

as % % <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

Households<br />

Population,<br />

both sexes<br />

With no draught animals24.4 15.7 3.7 14.7 2.1 8.1 4.4<br />

” 1 ” animal 29.6 25.3 18.5 23.4 13.9 19.8 19.2<br />

” 2 and more animals29.6 25.3 18.5 23.4 13.9 19.8 19.2<br />

Total . . . . . . 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Total animals<br />

Allotment<br />

land<br />

Rented land<br />

Total land<br />

in use<br />

Area under<br />

crops<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!