22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

389<br />

per establishment (72) conceal the true character <strong>of</strong> the<br />

trade” (loc. cit., 39). The specialisation characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacture is seen here clearly in the separation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industrialists from agriculture (the land is abandoned,<br />

on the one hand by the impoverished weavers, and on the<br />

other by the big manufac<strong>to</strong>ry owners) and in the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a special type <strong>of</strong> industrial population, who live much<br />

more “decently” than do the agriculturists, and look down<br />

upon the muzhik (loc. cit., 106). Our fac<strong>to</strong>ry statistics<br />

have always registered only a very casually selected fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> this industry.*<br />

The “galloon industry” in Moscow Gubernia is capitalist<br />

manufacture organised in a quite analogous fashion.**<br />

Such precisely is the case with regard <strong>to</strong> the printed calico<br />

industry in Kamyshin Uyezd, Sara<strong>to</strong>v Gubernia. According<br />

<strong>to</strong> the Direc<strong>to</strong>ry for 1890, there were here 31 “fac<strong>to</strong>ries”<br />

with 4,250 workers and output <strong>to</strong>talling 265,000<br />

rubles, while according <strong>to</strong> the List there was one “workdistributing<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice” with 33 workers in the establishment<br />

and an output <strong>to</strong>talling 47,000 rubles. (In other words, in<br />

1890 workers employed in the establishment and on the side<br />

were lumped <strong>to</strong>gether!) According <strong>to</strong> local investiga<strong>to</strong>rs, in<br />

1888 nearly 7,000 looms were engaged in producing printed<br />

calico,*** an output <strong>to</strong>talling 2 million rubles, and “the<br />

* The Military Statistical Abstract managed <strong>to</strong> count in<br />

Vladimir Gubernia, in 1866, 98 silk fac<strong>to</strong>ries (!) with 98 workers<br />

and a <strong>to</strong>tal output <strong>of</strong> 4,000 rubles(!). The Direc<strong>to</strong>ry for 1890 gives 35<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ries, 2,112 workers, and 936,000 rubles. According <strong>to</strong> the List<br />

for 1894-95 there were 98 fac<strong>to</strong>ries, 2,281 workers, with an output<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1,918,000 rubles, and in addition, 2,477 workers “outside <strong>of</strong><br />

establishments, on the side.” Just try <strong>to</strong> distinguish “handicraftsmen”<br />

here from “fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers”!<br />

** According <strong>to</strong> the Direc<strong>to</strong>ry for 1890 there were outside <strong>of</strong><br />

Moscow 10 galloon fac<strong>to</strong>ries, with 303 workers and an output <strong>to</strong>talling<br />

58,000 rubles. But according <strong>to</strong> Statistical Returns for Moscow<br />

Gubernia (<strong>Vol</strong>. VI, Pt. II), there were 400 establishments, with 2,619<br />

workers (<strong>of</strong> whom 72.8% were wage-workers) and with an output<br />

<strong>to</strong>talling 963,000 rubles.<br />

*** The Collection <strong>of</strong> Fac<strong>to</strong>ry Inspec<strong>to</strong>rs’ Reports for 1903 (St.<br />

Petersburg, 1906) states that in Sara<strong>to</strong>v Gubernia there were 33<br />

distributing <strong>of</strong>fices with 10,000 workers. (Note <strong>to</strong> 2nd edition.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!