22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

590<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

has been said above on the formation <strong>of</strong> a home market<br />

for capitalist society. The home market for capitalism is<br />

created by the parallel development <strong>of</strong> capitalism in agriculture<br />

and in industry,* by the formation <strong>of</strong> a class <strong>of</strong><br />

rural and industrial employers, on the one hand, and <strong>of</strong> a<br />

class <strong>of</strong> rural and industrial wage-workers, on the other.<br />

The main streams <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> workers show the main<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> this process, but by far not all the forms; in what<br />

has gone before we have shown that the forms <strong>of</strong> this<br />

process differ in peasant and in landlord farming, in the<br />

different areas <strong>of</strong> commercial agriculture, in the different<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> the capitalist development <strong>of</strong> industry, etc.<br />

How far this process is dis<strong>to</strong>rted and confused by the<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> Narodnik economics is seen most<br />

clearly in §VI <strong>of</strong> Part 2 <strong>of</strong> Mr. N. —on’s Sketches, which<br />

bears the significant heading: “The Influence <strong>of</strong> the Redistribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Social Productive Forces upon the Economic<br />

Position <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Population.” Here is how<br />

Mr. N. —on pictures this “redistribution”: “. . . In capitalist<br />

. . . society, every increase in the productive power <strong>of</strong><br />

labour entails the ‘freeing’ <strong>of</strong> a corresponding number <strong>of</strong><br />

workers, who are compelled <strong>to</strong> seek some other employment;<br />

and since this occurs in all branches <strong>of</strong> production, and this<br />

‘freeing’ takes place over the whole <strong>of</strong> capitalist society,<br />

the only thing left open <strong>to</strong> them is <strong>to</strong> turn <strong>to</strong> the means <strong>of</strong><br />

production <strong>of</strong> which they have not yet been deprived, namely,<br />

the land” (p. 126). . . . “Our peasants have not been deprived<br />

<strong>of</strong> the land, and that is why they turn their efforts <strong>to</strong>wards<br />

it. When they lose their employment in the fac<strong>to</strong>ry, or are<br />

obliged <strong>to</strong> abandon their subsidiary domestic occupations,<br />

they see no other course but <strong>to</strong> set about the increased<br />

exploitation <strong>of</strong> the soil. All Zemstvo statistical returns<br />

* Theoretical economics established this simple truth long ago.<br />

To say nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>, who pointed directly <strong>to</strong> the development <strong>of</strong><br />

capitalism in agriculture as a process that creates a “home market for<br />

industrial capital” (Das Kapital, I 2 , S. 776, Chapter 24, Sec. 5), 164<br />

let us refer <strong>to</strong> Adam Smith. In chapter XI <strong>of</strong> Book I and Chapter IV<br />

<strong>of</strong> Book III <strong>of</strong> The Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations, he pointed <strong>to</strong> the most characteristic<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> capitalist agriculture and noted<br />

the parallelism <strong>of</strong> this process with the process <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>to</strong>wns and the development <strong>of</strong> industry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!