22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

183<br />

gration and mainly the extreme groups who are remaining<br />

at home. Thus, migration is accelerating the differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the peasantry in the areas <strong>of</strong> emigration and is carrying<br />

the elements <strong>of</strong> differentiation <strong>to</strong> the new places (the agricultural<br />

wage-labour <strong>of</strong> settlers in Siberia in the first period<br />

<strong>of</strong> their new life.* This connection between migration and<br />

the differentiation <strong>of</strong> the peasantry is fully proved by<br />

I. Hourwich in his superb research work, Peasant Migration<br />

<strong>to</strong> Siberia (Moscow, 1888). We strongly recommend <strong>to</strong> the<br />

reader this book which our Narodnik press has strenuously<br />

tried <strong>to</strong> hush up.**<br />

9) A tremendous part, as is known, is played in our rural<br />

districts by merchant’s and usurer’s capital. We consider<br />

it superfluous <strong>to</strong> cite numerous facts and indicate sources<br />

relating <strong>to</strong> this phenomenon: the facts are well known and<br />

do not directly concern our theme. The only question <strong>of</strong><br />

interest <strong>to</strong> us is the following: What relation has merchant’s<br />

and usurer’s capital in our countryside <strong>to</strong> the differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the peasantry? Is there any connection between<br />

the relations among the various groups <strong>of</strong> peasants<br />

described above and the relations between peasant credi<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

and peasant deb<strong>to</strong>rs? Is usury a fac<strong>to</strong>r and a motive force<br />

<strong>of</strong> differentiation, or does it retard this differentiation?<br />

Let us first indicate how theory presents this question.<br />

In the analysis <strong>of</strong> capitalist production given by the author<br />

<strong>of</strong> Capital very great significance was attached, as we<br />

know, <strong>to</strong> merchant’s and usurer’s capital. The main points<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>’s views on this subject are the following: 1) merchant’s<br />

and usurer’s capital, on the one hand, and<br />

industrial capital [i.e., capital invested in production,<br />

whether agricultural or industrial], on the other, represent a<br />

single type <strong>of</strong> economic phenomenon, which is covered by<br />

the general formula: the buying <strong>of</strong> commodities in order<br />

<strong>to</strong> sell at a pr<strong>of</strong>it (Das Kapital, I, 2. Abschnitt, Chapter<br />

IV, especially pp. 148-149 <strong>of</strong> the second German edition 73 ).<br />

2) Merchant’s and usurer’s capital always his<strong>to</strong>rically precede<br />

* Restriction <strong>of</strong> migration thus has an enormously retarding<br />

effect upon the differentiation <strong>of</strong> the peasantry.<br />

** See also Mr. Preemak’s Material in Figures for a Study <strong>of</strong><br />

Migration <strong>to</strong> Siberia. (Note <strong>to</strong> 2nd edition.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!