22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

549<br />

Gubernia). A comparison <strong>of</strong> the different uyezds shows the<br />

most highly industrialised ones <strong>to</strong> be marked by the lowest<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> locally-born workers. For example, in the<br />

poorly industrialised Mozhaisk and <strong>Vol</strong>okolamsk uyezds<br />

from 92 <strong>to</strong> 93% <strong>of</strong> the fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers are natives <strong>of</strong> the uyezd<br />

where they work. In the very highly industrialised Moscow,<br />

Kolomna and Bogorodsk uyezds the percentage <strong>of</strong> locallyborn<br />

workers drops <strong>to</strong> 24%, 40% and 50%. <strong>From</strong> this the<br />

investiga<strong>to</strong>rs draw the conclusion that “the considerable<br />

development <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>ry production in an uyezd encourages<br />

the influx <strong>of</strong> outside elements.”* These facts show also (let<br />

us add) that the movement <strong>of</strong> industrial workers bears the<br />

same features that we observed in the movement <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

workers. That is <strong>to</strong> say, industrial workers, <strong>to</strong>o, migrate<br />

not only from localities where there is a surplus <strong>of</strong> labour,<br />

but also from those where there is a shortage. For example,<br />

the Bronnitsi Uyezd attracts 1,125 workers from other uyezds<br />

<strong>of</strong> Moscow Gubernia and from other gubernias, while at the<br />

same time providing 1,246 workers for the more highly<br />

industrialised Moscow and Bogorodsk uyezds. Hence, workers<br />

leave not only because they do not find “local occupations<br />

at hand,” but also because they make for the places where<br />

conditions are better. Elementary as this fact is, it is worth<br />

while giving the Narodnik economists a further reminder <strong>of</strong><br />

it, for they idealise local occupations and condemn<br />

migration <strong>to</strong> industrial districts, ignoring the progressive<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the mobility <strong>of</strong> the population created by<br />

capitalism.<br />

The above-described characteristic features which distinguish<br />

large-scale machine industry from the preceding<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> industry may be summed up in the words—socialisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour. Indeed, production for an enormous<br />

national and international market, development <strong>of</strong> close<br />

commercial ties with various parts <strong>of</strong> the country and with<br />

different countries for the purchase <strong>of</strong> raw and auxiliary<br />

materials, enormous technical progress, concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

production and <strong>of</strong> the population in colossal enterprises,<br />

demolition <strong>of</strong> the worn-out traditions <strong>of</strong> patriarchal life,<br />

* Statistical Returns for Moscow Gubernia, Sanitary Statistical<br />

Section, <strong>Vol</strong>. IV, Sec. I (Moscow, 1890), p. 240.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!