22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

241<br />

that in the black-earth belt about 25% <strong>of</strong> all working males<br />

are engaged in hired agricultural labour, and in the nonblack-earth<br />

area about 10%. This gives us the number <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural workers in European Russia as 3,395,000, or,<br />

in round numbers, 32 million (Rudnev, loc. cit., p. 448.<br />

This number is about 20% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> males <strong>of</strong><br />

working age). It must be observed in this connection that,<br />

according <strong>to</strong> Mr. Rudnev, “day labour and agricultural jobwork<br />

were placed in the category <strong>of</strong> industries by the<br />

statisticians only when they were the chief occupation <strong>of</strong><br />

the given person or family” (loc. cit., 446).*<br />

Mr. Rudnev’s figure should be regarded as the minimum,<br />

because, firstly, the Zemstvo census returns are more or<br />

less out-<strong>of</strong>-date, relating <strong>to</strong> the 80s and at times even <strong>to</strong><br />

the 70s, and because, secondly, in determining the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> agricultural workers, no account whatever was taken<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Baltic and Western gubernias, where agricultural<br />

capitalism is highly developed. For want <strong>of</strong> other data,<br />

however, we are obliged <strong>to</strong> take this figure <strong>of</strong> 32 million.<br />

It appears, consequently, that about one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the peasants<br />

have already reached a position where their “chief<br />

occupation” is that <strong>of</strong> wage-labour for rich peasants and landlords.<br />

We see here the first group <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurs who<br />

present a demand for the labour-power <strong>of</strong> the rural proletariat.<br />

These are the rural entrepreneurs, who employ about<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the bot<strong>to</strong>m group <strong>of</strong> the peasantry. Thus, there is <strong>to</strong> be<br />

observed a complete interdependence between the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a class <strong>of</strong> rural entrepreneurs and the expansion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bot<strong>to</strong>m group <strong>of</strong> the “peasantry,” i.e., the increase in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> rural proletarians. Among these rural entrepreneurs<br />

a prominent part is played by the peasant bourgeoisie:<br />

for example, in 9 uyezds <strong>of</strong> Voronezh Gubernia, 43.4%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the farm labourers are employed by peasants (Rudnev,<br />

434). Were we <strong>to</strong> take this percentage as the standard for<br />

all rural workers and for the whole <strong>of</strong> Russia, it would be<br />

seen that the peasant bourgeoisie present a demand for<br />

* This figure does not include, therefore, the mass <strong>of</strong> peasants<br />

for whom hired agricultural labour is not the chief occupation, but<br />

one <strong>of</strong> equal importance with their own farms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!