22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

310<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

mation effected in the small cultiva<strong>to</strong>r by capitalism is everywhere<br />

the same. The more rapid the increase in the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>wns, the number <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>ry, commercial and industrial<br />

<strong>to</strong>wnships, and the number <strong>of</strong> railway stations, the more<br />

extensive is the area <strong>of</strong> the transformation <strong>of</strong> our “villagecommunity<br />

man” in<strong>to</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> peasant. We should not<br />

forget what was said in his day by Adam Smith—that<br />

improved communications tend <strong>to</strong> convert every village<br />

in<strong>to</strong> a suburb.* Remote areas cut <strong>of</strong>f from the outside world,<br />

already an exception, are with every passing day increasingly<br />

becoming as rare as antiquities, and the cultiva<strong>to</strong>r is<br />

turning with ever-growing rapidity in<strong>to</strong> an industrialist<br />

subjected <strong>to</strong> the general laws <strong>of</strong> commodity production.<br />

In thus concluding the review <strong>of</strong> the data on the growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> commercial agriculture, we think it not superfluous <strong>to</strong><br />

repeat here that our aim has been <strong>to</strong> examine the main (by<br />

no means all) forms <strong>of</strong> commercial agriculture.<br />

IX. CONCLUSIONS ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CAPITALISM<br />

IN RUSSIAN AGRICULTURE<br />

In chapters II-IV the problem <strong>of</strong> capitalism in Russian<br />

agriculture has been examined from two angles. First we<br />

examined the existing system <strong>of</strong> social and economic relations<br />

in peasant and landlord economy, the system which<br />

has taken shape in the post-Reform period. It was seen that<br />

the peasantry have been splitting up at enormous speed in<strong>to</strong><br />

a numerically small but economically strong rural bourgeoisie<br />

and a rural proletariat. Inseparably connected with this<br />

“depeasantising” process is the landowners’ transition from<br />

the labour-service <strong>to</strong> the capitalist system <strong>of</strong> farming. Then<br />

we examined this same process from another angle: we <strong>to</strong>ok<br />

as our starting-point the manner in which agriculture is<br />

transformed in<strong>to</strong> commodity production, and examined<br />

the social and economic relations characteristic <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />

the principal forms <strong>of</strong> commercial agriculture. It was shown<br />

that the very same processes were conspicuous in both<br />

* “Good roads, canals and navigable rivers, by diminishing the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> carriage, put the remote parts <strong>of</strong> the country more nearly<br />

upon a level with those in the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>wn.” Op.<br />

cit., <strong>Vol</strong>. I, pp. 228-229.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!