22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

219<br />

Thus, Engelhardt’s own farm is better than all arguments<br />

in refuting Engelhardt’s Narodnik theories. He set out <strong>to</strong><br />

farm on rational lines, but was unable <strong>to</strong> do so, under the<br />

given social and economic conditions, except by organising<br />

the farm on the basis <strong>of</strong> employing farm labourers. The<br />

raising <strong>of</strong> the technical level <strong>of</strong> agriculture and the supplanting<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour-service by capitalism proceeded hand in hand<br />

on this farm, as it does on all private-landowner farms in<br />

general in Russia. This process is most clearly reflected in the<br />

employment <strong>of</strong> machinery in Russian agriculture.<br />

VII. THE EMPLOYMENT OF MACHINERY IN AGRICULTURE<br />

The post-Reform epoch is divided in<strong>to</strong> four periods as<br />

regards the development <strong>of</strong> agricultural machinery production<br />

and the employment <strong>of</strong> machinery in agriculture.* The first<br />

period covers the years immediately preceding the peasant<br />

Reform and the years immediately following it. The landlords<br />

at first rushed <strong>to</strong> purchase foreign machinery so as <strong>to</strong><br />

get along without the “unpaid” labour <strong>of</strong> the serfs and <strong>to</strong><br />

avoid the difficulties connected with the hiring <strong>of</strong> free workers.<br />

This attempt ended, <strong>of</strong> course, in failure; the fever soon<br />

died down, and beginning with 1863-1864 the demand for<br />

foreign machinery dropped. The end <strong>of</strong> the 70s saw the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the second period, which continued until 1885.<br />

It was marked by an extremely steady and extremely rapid<br />

increase in machinery imports from abroad; home production<br />

also grew steadily, but more slowly than imports. <strong>From</strong><br />

1881 <strong>to</strong> 1884 there was a particularly rapid increase in<br />

* See His<strong>to</strong>rico-Statistical Survey <strong>of</strong> Russian Industry, <strong>Vol</strong>. I,<br />

St. Petersburg, 1883 (published for 1882 exhibition), article by V. Chernyayev:<br />

“Agricultural Machinery Production.”—Dit<strong>to</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>. II,<br />

St. Petersburg, 1886, in group IX.—Agriculture and Forestry in<br />

Russia (St. Petersburg, 1893, published for Chicago Exhibition),<br />

article by V. Chernyayev: “Agricultural Implements and Machines.”—<br />

Productive Forces <strong>of</strong> Russia (St. Petersburg, 1896, published for 1896<br />

exhibition), article by Mr. <strong>Lenin</strong>: “Agricultural Implements and<br />

Machines” (sect. 1).—Vestnik Finansov [Financial Messenger], 1896,<br />

No. 51 and 1897 No. 21.—V. Raspopin, article cited. Only the lastmentioned<br />

article puts the question on a political-economic basis;<br />

all the previous ones were written by agricultural experts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!