22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

371<br />

<strong>of</strong> the householder; 2) by “hiring,” i.e., by hiring some neighbour<br />

who tills the land <strong>of</strong> the “distressed” householder<br />

with his own implements. This method <strong>of</strong> cultivation is<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> the poor peasant who is being steadily<br />

ruined. Of opposite significance is the third method,<br />

namely, cultivation with the aid <strong>of</strong> a “labourer,” i.e., the<br />

hire <strong>of</strong> agricultural (“land”) labourers by the farmer. These<br />

workers are usually hired for the whole summer; and, particularly<br />

in the busy season, the master usually reinforces<br />

them with employees from his workshop. “Thus, the method<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultivating the soil with the aid <strong>of</strong> the ‘land’ labourer<br />

is quite a pr<strong>of</strong>itable one” (Industries <strong>of</strong> Moscow Gubernia,<br />

VI, I, 48). In our table we have assembled the data on<br />

this method <strong>of</strong> cultivation for 16 industries, in 7 <strong>of</strong> which<br />

there are no masters who hire “land labourers.” In all these<br />

16 industries the master industrialists who hire rural labourers<br />

constitute 12% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal, and by grades: I) 4.5%;<br />

II) 16.7% and III) 27.3%. The better <strong>of</strong>f the industrialists are,<br />

the more <strong>of</strong>ten we find rural entrepreneurs among them.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the data on the industrial peasantry consequently<br />

reveals the same picture <strong>of</strong> parallel differentiation<br />

in both industry and agriculture that we observed in Chapter<br />

II on the basis <strong>of</strong> the data on the agricultural peasantry.<br />

The hiring <strong>of</strong> “land labourers” by “handicraft” masters<br />

is very widespread in all the industrial gubernias. We<br />

meet, for example, with references <strong>to</strong> the hiring <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

labourers by the rich bast-matting makers <strong>of</strong> Nizhni-<br />

Novgorod Gubernia. The furriers <strong>of</strong> the same gubernia<br />

hire agricultural labourers, who usually come from the purely<br />

agricultural surrounding villages. The “village-community<br />

peasants <strong>of</strong> Kimry <strong>Vol</strong>ost engaged in the boot industry<br />

find it pr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>to</strong> hire for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> their fields<br />

men and women labourers who come <strong>to</strong> Kimry in large<br />

numbers from Tver Uyezd and neighbouring . . . localities.”<br />

The pottery decora<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> Kostroma Gubernia send their<br />

wage-workers, when not occupied at their regular jobs, <strong>to</strong><br />

work in the fields.* “The independent masters” (metalbeaters<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vladimir Gubernia) “keep special field workers”;<br />

* Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Handicraft Commission, III, 57, 112; VIII,<br />

1354; IX, 1931, 2093, 2185.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!