22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

213<br />

Let us deal somewhat with another, very curious, argument<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Kablukov. We have seen that he idealises<br />

labour-service; but it is remarkable that when he, as a statistician,<br />

describes real types <strong>of</strong> purely capitalist farms in Moscow<br />

Gubernia, his description, in spite <strong>of</strong> himself, and in a<br />

dis<strong>to</strong>rted way, is a reflection <strong>of</strong> the very facts that prove the<br />

progressive nature <strong>of</strong> capitalism in Russian agriculture. We<br />

beg the reader’s attention, and apologise in advance for our<br />

rather lengthy quotations.<br />

Besides the old types <strong>of</strong> farms employing hired labour,<br />

there is <strong>to</strong> be found in Moscow Gubernia<br />

“a new, recent, emergent type <strong>of</strong> farm that has <strong>to</strong>tally broken<br />

with all tradition and regards things simply, in the way people<br />

regard every industry that is <strong>to</strong> serve as a source <strong>of</strong> income.<br />

Agriculture in this case is not regarded as ... a lord’s hobby, as an<br />

occupation anybody may engage in. . . . No, here the necessity is<br />

recognised <strong>of</strong> having ... special knowledge.... The basis <strong>of</strong> calculation”<br />

(as <strong>to</strong> the organisation <strong>of</strong> production) “is the same as in all other<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> production” (Statistical Returns for Moscow Gubernia, <strong>Vol</strong>.<br />

V, Pt. I, pp. 185-186).<br />

Mr. Kablukov does not notice that this description <strong>of</strong><br />

the new type <strong>of</strong> farm which has only “recently emerged,”<br />

in the 70s, proves precisely the progressive nature <strong>of</strong> capitalism<br />

in agriculture. It was capitalism that first turned<br />

agriculture from a “lord’s hobby” in<strong>to</strong> ordinary industry, it<br />

was capitalism that first compelled people “<strong>to</strong> regard things<br />

simply,” “<strong>to</strong> break with tradition” and <strong>to</strong> equip themselves<br />

with “special knowledge.” Before capitalism this was both<br />

unnecessary and impossible, because the farms <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

manors, village communities and peasant families were “selfsufficing,”<br />

were not dependent on other farms, and no power<br />

on earth could drag them out <strong>of</strong> their age-long stagnation.<br />

Capitalism was the force which created (through the medium<br />

<strong>of</strong> the market) the social accounting <strong>of</strong> the output <strong>of</strong> the<br />

individual producers, and compelled them <strong>to</strong> reckon with the<br />

demands <strong>of</strong> social development. It is this that constitutes<br />

the progressive role <strong>of</strong> capitalism in agriculture in all European<br />

countries.<br />

Listen now <strong>to</strong> the way Mr. Kablukov describes our purely<br />

capitalist farms:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!