22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

566<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

3) T h e G r o w t h o f F a c t o r y a n d o f C o m m e r c i a l<br />

a n d I n d u s t r i a l T o w n s h i p s a n d V i l l a g e s<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>wns, the following have the significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial centres: firstly, suburbs, which are not<br />

always counted with the <strong>to</strong>wns and which are spreading in<br />

an increasing area around the big <strong>to</strong>wns; and secondly, fac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

<strong>to</strong>wnships and villages. Such industrial centres* are<br />

particularly numerous in the industrial gubernias where the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> urban population is extremely low.** The<br />

above table containing the data, by areas, <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>wn<br />

population shows that in the 9 industrial gubernias the percentage<br />

in 1863 was 7.3% and in 1897, 8.6%. The fact is<br />

that the commercial and industrial population <strong>of</strong> these<br />

gubernias is concentrated mainly, not in <strong>to</strong>wns, but in industrial<br />

villages. Among the “<strong>to</strong>wns” <strong>of</strong> Vladimir, Kostroma,<br />

Nizhni-Novgorod and other gubernias there are not a few<br />

with less than 3,000, 2,000 or even 1,000 inhabitants, whereas<br />

there are numerous “villages” in each <strong>of</strong> which there<br />

are 2,000, 3,000 or 5,000 fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers alone. In the post-<br />

Reform period, rightly observes the compiler <strong>of</strong> the Survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> Yaroslavl Gubernia (<strong>Vol</strong>. II., 191), “the <strong>to</strong>wns have begun<br />

<strong>to</strong> grow still faster, and in addition there has been the growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> settlements <strong>of</strong> a new type, a type <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>ry centre<br />

midway between the <strong>to</strong>wn and the village.” We have<br />

cited data showing the enormous growth <strong>of</strong> these centres<br />

and the number <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers concentrated in them.<br />

We have seen that there are quite a few centres <strong>of</strong> this kind<br />

throughout Russia, not only in the industrial gubernias,<br />

but also in the South. In the Urals the percentage <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

population is lowest: in Vyatka and Perm gubernias it was<br />

3.2% in 1863 and 4.7% in 1897. But here is an example <strong>of</strong><br />

the relative size <strong>of</strong> the “urban” and the industrial populations:<br />

in Krasnoufimsk Uyezd, Perm Gubernia, the urban<br />

population numbers 6,400 (1897), whereas according <strong>to</strong><br />

the Zemstvo census <strong>of</strong> 1888-1891, the population <strong>of</strong> the<br />

* See above, Chapter VII, §VIII, and Appendix III <strong>to</strong> Chapter<br />

VII.<br />

** On the significance <strong>of</strong> this circumstance, <strong>to</strong> which Korsak in<br />

his day drew attention, compare the just remarks <strong>of</strong> Mr. <strong>Vol</strong>gin (loc.<br />

cit., pp. 215-216).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!