22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

573<br />

The question now arises: how large is the number <strong>of</strong> nonagricultural<br />

and <strong>of</strong> agricultural migra<strong>to</strong>ry workers? Mr.<br />

N. —on very boldly and quite mistakenly asserts that “the<br />

overwhelming majority <strong>of</strong> peasant outside employments<br />

are agricultural” (Sketches, p. 16). Chaslavsky, whom Mr.<br />

N. —on cites, expresses himself much more cautiously;<br />

he cites no data and limits himself <strong>to</strong> general remarks about<br />

the size <strong>of</strong> the areas which provide workers <strong>of</strong> one type or<br />

another. On the other hand, Mr. N. —on’s railway passenger<br />

traffic data prove absolutely nothing, for non-agricultural<br />

workers also leave their homes mainly in spring and,<br />

moreover, use the railways much more than agricultural<br />

workers do.* We presume, on the contrary, that the<br />

majority (although not the “overwhelming” majority) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

migra<strong>to</strong>ry workers are probably non-agricultural workers.<br />

This view is based, firstly, on data concerning the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> passport revenue, and, secondly, on Mr. Vesin’s<br />

data. Years ago Flerovsky, on the basis <strong>of</strong> the returns<br />

for 1862-63 showing the distribution <strong>of</strong> revenue from “miscellaneous<br />

duties” (more than one-third <strong>of</strong> which was<br />

obtained from the issue <strong>of</strong> passports), drew the conclusion that<br />

the greatest movement <strong>of</strong> peasants in search <strong>of</strong> work was<br />

from the metropolitan and the non-agricultural gubernias.**<br />

If we take the 11 non-agricultural gubernias which we combined<br />

above (part 2 <strong>of</strong> this section) in<strong>to</strong> a single area, and<br />

which non-agricultural workers leave in large numbers, we<br />

shall see that these gubernias in 1885 contained only 18.7%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> all European Russia (in 1897—18.3%),<br />

whereas they accounted for 42.9% <strong>of</strong> the passport revenue<br />

in 1885 (in 1891—40.7%).*** Non-agricultural workers are<br />

provided by very many other gubernias, and we must therefore<br />

conclude that agricultural workers constitute less than<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the migrants. Mr. Vesin divides 38 gubernias <strong>of</strong> European<br />

Russia (which account for 90% <strong>of</strong> the departure<br />

* Cf. above, p. 239, footnote.<br />

** The Condition <strong>of</strong> the Working Class in Russia, St. Petersburg,<br />

1869, p. 400 and foll.<br />

*** Data on passport revenue taken from Returns for Russia<br />

for 1884-85 and for 1896. In 1885, passport revenue in European<br />

Russia amounted <strong>to</strong> 37 rubles per 1,000 inhabitants; in the 11 nonagricultural<br />

gubernias it was 86 rubles per 1,000 inhabitants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!