22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

448<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

we described in Chapter II as the formation <strong>of</strong> an agricultural<br />

proletariat <strong>of</strong> millions, is, incidentally, the enormous<br />

development in the post-Reform period <strong>of</strong> capitalist<br />

domestic industry. “What has become <strong>of</strong> the hands released<br />

from the occupations <strong>of</strong> domestic, strictly natural economy,<br />

which had in view the family and the few consumers in<br />

the neighbouring market? The fac<strong>to</strong>ries overcrowded with<br />

workers, the rapid expansion <strong>of</strong> large-scale domestic industry<br />

provide a clear answer” (Industries <strong>of</strong> Vladimir Gubernia, III,<br />

20. Our italics). The figures given in the following section<br />

will show how great the number <strong>of</strong> workers employed by<br />

entrepreneurs in domestic industry must be in Russia<br />

<strong>to</strong>day.<br />

VIII. WHAT IS “HANDICRAFT” INDUSTRY?<br />

In the two preceding chapters we dealt mainly with<br />

what in Russia is usually called “handicraft” industry; we<br />

may now try <strong>to</strong> answer the question put in the heading.<br />

Let us begin with some statistics, so as <strong>to</strong> judge which<br />

<strong>of</strong> the forms <strong>of</strong> industry analysed above figure in publications<br />

among the general mass <strong>of</strong> “handicraft industries.”<br />

The Moscow statisticians, in concluding their investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the peasant “industries,” summarised all and<br />

sundry non-agricultural occupations. They listed al<strong>to</strong>gether<br />

141,329 persons (<strong>Vol</strong>. VII, Pt. III) engaged in local<br />

industries (in the making <strong>of</strong> commodities), but among these<br />

were included artisans (a section <strong>of</strong> the shoe-makers, glaziers<br />

and many others), wood sawyers, etc., etc. Not fewer<br />

than 87,000 (according <strong>to</strong> our calculations <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

industries) were domestic workers employed by capitalists.*<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> wage-workers in the 54 industries<br />

for which we have been able <strong>to</strong> combine the data is 17,566,<br />

out <strong>of</strong> 29,446, i.e., 59.65%. For Vladimir Gubernia we<br />

have obtained the following results (from five issues <strong>of</strong><br />

Industries <strong>of</strong> Vladimir Gubernia): al<strong>to</strong>gether, 18,286<br />

engaged in 31 industries; <strong>of</strong> these 15,447 were engaged in<br />

* Let us recall that Mr. Kharizomenov (article quoted above)<br />

calculated that <strong>of</strong> 102,245 persons engaged in 42 industries <strong>of</strong> Moscow<br />

Gubernia, 66% were engaged in industries where there was an absolute<br />

predominance <strong>of</strong> the domestic system <strong>of</strong> large-scale production.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!