22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

380<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

and one <strong>of</strong> the most striking features <strong>of</strong> the post-Reform<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> Russia is the extremely rapid and extremely<br />

wide incidence <strong>of</strong> this form.<br />

5) Petty-bourgeois (commercial) agriculture is combined<br />

with petty-bourgeois industries (small commodity production<br />

in industry, petty trade, etc.).<br />

The difference between this form and the third is that<br />

here petty-bourgeois relations embrace not only industry<br />

but also agriculture. Being the most typical form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> industry with agriculture in the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

the small rural bourgeoisie, this form is therefore characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> all capitalist countries. The honour <strong>of</strong> discovering<br />

a capitalism without a petty bourgeoisie fell <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Russian Narodnik economists alone.<br />

6) Wage-labour in agriculture is combined with wagelabour<br />

in industry. We have already discussed how such a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> industry and agriculture manifests itself<br />

and what it signifies.<br />

Thus, the forms <strong>of</strong> the “combination <strong>of</strong> agriculture with<br />

industry” among our peasantry are extremely varied: there<br />

are those which express the most primitive economic system<br />

with the dominance <strong>of</strong> natural economy; there are those<br />

which express a high development <strong>of</strong> capitalism; there are<br />

a whole number <strong>of</strong> transitional stages between the former<br />

and the latter. By confining oneself <strong>to</strong> general formulas<br />

such as: the “combination <strong>of</strong> industry with agriculture,”<br />

or the “separation <strong>of</strong> industry from agriculture”), one cannot<br />

advance a single step in explaining the actual process<br />

<strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> capitalism.<br />

IX. SOME REMARKS ON THE PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMY<br />

OF OUR COUNTRYSIDE<br />

The essence <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>of</strong> “the destiny <strong>of</strong> capitalism<br />

in Russia” is <strong>of</strong>ten presented as though prime importance<br />

attaches <strong>to</strong> the question: how fast? (i.e., how fast<br />

is capitalism developing?). Actually, however, far greater<br />

importance attaches <strong>to</strong> the question: how exactly? and <strong>to</strong><br />

the question: where from? (i.e., what was the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the pre-capitalist economic system in Russia?). The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!