22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

solution” (Das Kapital, II, 469). 19 Messrs. V. V. and N.—on<br />

imagined that they were giving a pr<strong>of</strong>ound appraisal <strong>of</strong><br />

the contradictions <strong>of</strong> capitalism by pointing <strong>to</strong> the difficulties<br />

<strong>of</strong> realising surplus-value. Actually, however, they<br />

were giving an extremely superficial appraisal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contradictions <strong>of</strong> capitalism, for if one speaks <strong>of</strong> the “difficulties”<br />

<strong>of</strong> realisation, <strong>of</strong> the crises, etc., arising therefrom,<br />

one must admit that these “difficulties” are not only possible<br />

but are necessary as regards all parts <strong>of</strong> the capitalist<br />

product, and not as regards surplus-value alone. Difficulties<br />

<strong>of</strong> this kind, due <strong>to</strong> disproportion in the distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

various branches <strong>of</strong> production, constantly arise, not only<br />

in realising surplus-value, but also in realising variable<br />

and constant capital; in realising not only the product<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> articles <strong>of</strong> consumption, but also that consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> means <strong>of</strong> production. Without “difficulties” <strong>of</strong> this<br />

kind and crises, there cannot, in general, be any capitalist<br />

production, production by isolated producers for a world<br />

market unknown <strong>to</strong> them.<br />

V. THE VIEWS OF ADAM SMITH ON THE PRODUCTION<br />

AND CIRCULATION OF THE AGGREGATE SOCIAL PRODUCT<br />

IN CAPITALIST SOCIETY AND MARX’S CRITICISM<br />

OF THESE VIEWS<br />

In order properly <strong>to</strong> understand the theory <strong>of</strong> realisation<br />

we must start with Adam Smith, who laid the foundation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the erroneous theory on this subject that held undivided<br />

sway in political economy until <strong>Marx</strong>. Adam Smith divided<br />

the price <strong>of</strong> a commodity in<strong>to</strong> only two parts: variable capital<br />

(wages, in his terminology) and surplus-value (he<br />

does not combine “pr<strong>of</strong>it” and “rent,” so that actually he<br />

counted three parts in all.)* Similarly, he divided the sum-<br />

* Adam Smith, An Inquiry In<strong>to</strong> the Nature and Causes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations, 4th ed., 1801, <strong>Vol</strong>. I, p. 75, Book I: “Of the Causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Improvement in the productive Powers <strong>of</strong> Labor, and <strong>of</strong> the Order<br />

according <strong>to</strong> which its Produce is naturally distributed among the<br />

different Ranks <strong>of</strong> the People,” Chapter VI, “Of the component Parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Price <strong>of</strong> Commodities,” Bibikov’s Russian translation (St.<br />

Petersburg, 1866), <strong>Vol</strong>. I, p. 171.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!