22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

accumulated part <strong>of</strong> surplus-value, the part converted<br />

in<strong>to</strong> capital, is entirely consumed by the productive workers,<br />

i.e., goes entirely in wages, whereas actually the accumulated<br />

part <strong>of</strong> surplus-value is expended on constant capital<br />

(instruments <strong>of</strong> production, raw and auxiliary materials)<br />

plus wages. Criticising this view <strong>of</strong> Smith (and also <strong>of</strong><br />

Ricardo, Mill and others) in Capital, <strong>Vol</strong>ume I (Part VII,<br />

“The Accumulation <strong>of</strong> Capital,” Chapter 22, “Conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

Surplus-Value in<strong>to</strong> Capital,” §2, “Erroneous Conception,<br />

by Political Economy, <strong>of</strong> Reproduction on a Progressively<br />

Increasing Scale”), <strong>Marx</strong> there states that in <strong>Vol</strong>ume II<br />

“it will be shown that Adam Smith’s dogma, inherited by all<br />

his successors, prevented political economy from understanding<br />

even the most elementary mechanism <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong><br />

social reproduction” (I, 612). 22 Adam Smith committed this<br />

error because he confused the value <strong>of</strong> the product with<br />

the newly created value: the latter does indeed resolve itself<br />

in<strong>to</strong> variable capital and surplus-value, whereas the former<br />

includes constant capital in addition. This error had been<br />

earlier exposed by <strong>Marx</strong> in his analysis <strong>of</strong> value, when he<br />

drew a distinction between abstract labour, which creates<br />

new value, and concrete, useful labour, which reproduces<br />

the previously existing value in the new form <strong>of</strong> a useful<br />

product. 23<br />

An explanation <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> the reproduction and<br />

circulation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal social capital is particularly necessary<br />

<strong>to</strong> settle the problem <strong>of</strong> the national revenue in capitalist<br />

society. It is extremely interesting <strong>to</strong> note that, when<br />

dealing with the latter problem, Adam Smith could no longer<br />

cling <strong>to</strong> his erroneous theory, which excludes constant capital<br />

from the country’s <strong>to</strong>tal product. “The gross revenue<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the inhabitants <strong>of</strong> a great country comprehends the<br />

whole annual produce <strong>of</strong> their land and labor; the neat<br />

revenue, what remains free <strong>to</strong> them after deducting the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> maintaining; first, their fixed; and, secondly, their<br />

circulating capital; or what, without encroaching upon their<br />

capital, they can place in their s<strong>to</strong>ck reserved for immediate<br />

consumption, or spend upon their subsistence, conveniencies,<br />

and amusements” (A. Smith, Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations, Book II.<br />

“Of the Nature, Accumulation, and Employment <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ck,”<br />

Chapter II, <strong>Vol</strong>. II, p. 18. Russ. trans., II, p. 21). Thus, from<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!