22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

budget in e is over five times that in b, whereas the size<br />

<strong>of</strong> the family in e is less than three times that in b.<br />

Let us examine the distribution <strong>of</strong> expenditures*:<br />

Average expenditure per farm<br />

On remaining Taxes<br />

On food personal On farm and dues Total<br />

Rbs. % consumption Rbs. % Rbs. % Rbs. %<br />

Rbs. %<br />

a) 60.98 55.89 17.51 16.05 15.12 13.87 15.47 14.19 109.08 100<br />

b) 80.98 46.47 17.19 9.87 58.32 33.46 17.77 10.20 174.26 100<br />

c) 181.11 47.77 44.62 11.77 121.42 32.02 32.02 8.44 379.17 100<br />

d) 283.65 44.86 76.77 12.14 222.39 35.17 49.55 7.83 632.36 100<br />

e) 373.81 39.88 147.83 15.77 347.76 37.12 67.90 7.23 937.30 100<br />

f) 447.83 28.10 82.76 5.19 976.84 61.29 86.34 5.42 1,593.77 100<br />

180.75 40.80 47.30 10.68 180.60 40.77 34.35 7.75 443.00 100<br />

It is sufficient <strong>to</strong> glance at the farm expenditure as compared<br />

with the <strong>to</strong>tal expenditure for each group <strong>to</strong> see that<br />

here we have both proletarians and proprie<strong>to</strong>rs: in group<br />

a the farm expenditure is only 14% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal expenditure,<br />

whereas in group f it is 61%. The differences in the absolute<br />

figures <strong>of</strong> farm expenditure go without saying. Such expenditure<br />

is negligible in the case not only <strong>of</strong> the horseless<br />

but also <strong>of</strong> the one-horse peasant, and the one-horse “peasant”<br />

is much closer <strong>to</strong> the ordinary type (in capitalist<br />

countries) <strong>of</strong> allotment-holding farm labourer and day<br />

labourer. Let us also note the very considerable differences<br />

in the percentage <strong>of</strong> expenditure on food (a’s nearly double<br />

f’s); as we know, a big percentage is evidence <strong>of</strong> a low standard<br />

<strong>of</strong> living and is what most sharply differentiates the<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> the proprie<strong>to</strong>r from that <strong>of</strong> the worker.<br />

* The Returns separate all “expenditure on personal and farm<br />

needs other than food” from expenditure on the maintenance <strong>of</strong> animals,<br />

and under the first heading, expenditures on lighting and on<br />

rent, for example, are put side by side. This is obviously wrong.<br />

We have separated personal from farm (“productive”) consumption,<br />

and under the latter heading we have included expenditure on tar,<br />

rope, horse-shoeing, building repairs, implements, harness; on labourers<br />

and job workers, on herdsman, on the renting <strong>of</strong> land, and on the<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> animals and poultry.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!