22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

537<br />

how this process is actually taking place and what different<br />

forms it assumes. Mr. V. V. points <strong>to</strong> the connection<br />

<strong>of</strong> our industrial worker with the land (in manufacture;<br />

our author does not think it necessary <strong>to</strong> distinguish<br />

the various stages <strong>of</strong> capitalism, although he pretends he is<br />

following the theory <strong>of</strong> the author <strong>of</strong> Capital!) and declaims<br />

in this regard about the “shameful (sic!) dependence” “<strong>of</strong> our<br />

(author’s italics) capitalist industry” upon the workerfarmer,<br />

etc. (Destiny <strong>of</strong> Capitalism, p. 114 and others).<br />

Mr. V. V. has apparently not heard, or has forgotten<br />

if he has beard, that not only in “our country” but<br />

everywhere in the West, capitalism failed <strong>to</strong> bring about<br />

the complete separation <strong>of</strong> the workers from the land before<br />

large-scale machine industry was established. Finally, Mr.<br />

Kablukov has quite recently presented his students with the<br />

following amazing dis<strong>to</strong>rtion <strong>of</strong> the facts: “Whereas in the<br />

West work in the fac<strong>to</strong>ry is the sole means <strong>of</strong> livelihood<br />

for the worker, in our country, with relatively few<br />

exceptions (sic!!!), the worker regards work in the fac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

as a subsidiary occupation, he is more attracted <strong>to</strong> the<br />

land.”*<br />

A factual analysis <strong>of</strong> this question has been made in Mr.<br />

Dementyev’s essay on the “fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers’ connection<br />

with agriculture” in the Moscow sanitary statistics.**<br />

Systematically collated statistics embracing about 20,000<br />

workers have shown that only 14.1% <strong>of</strong> the fac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

workers leave for agricultural employment. But far more<br />

important is the fact, proved in the greatest detail in the<br />

work mentioned, that it is precisely machine production that<br />

divorces the workers from the land. Of a whole series <strong>of</strong><br />

figures quoted in pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> this fact we select the following<br />

most striking ones.***<br />

* Lectures on Agricultural (sic!) Economics, edition for students,<br />

Moscow, 1897, p, 13. Perhaps our learned statistician thinks that we<br />

may regard as “relatively few exceptions” 85% <strong>of</strong> all cases (see further<br />

in text)?<br />

** Statistical Returns for Moscow Gubernia, Section <strong>of</strong> Sanitation<br />

Statistics, <strong>Vol</strong>. IV, Sec. II, Moscow, 1893. Reprinted in<br />

Mr. Dementyev’s well-known work: The Fac<strong>to</strong>ry, etc.<br />

*** Statistical Returns, loc. cit., p. 292. The Fac<strong>to</strong>ry, 2nd ed.,<br />

p. 36.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!