22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

least helping <strong>to</strong> clear up the problem. The mistake made by<br />

Messrs. V. V. and N.—on is that they bring in the foreign<br />

market <strong>to</strong> explain the realisation <strong>of</strong> surplus-value: while<br />

explaining absolutely nothing, this reference <strong>to</strong> the foreign<br />

market merely conceals their theoretical mistakes; that is<br />

one point. Another point is that it enables them, with the<br />

aid <strong>of</strong> these mistaken “theories,” <strong>to</strong> avoid the need <strong>to</strong> explain<br />

the fact <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> a home market for Russian<br />

capitalism.* The “foreign market” merely serves them as a<br />

pretext for obscuring the development <strong>of</strong> capitalism (and,<br />

consequently, <strong>of</strong> the market) inside the country—a pretext<br />

all the more convenient in that it also relieves them <strong>of</strong> the<br />

need <strong>to</strong> examine the facts which show that Russian capitalism<br />

is winning foreign markets.**<br />

The need for a capitalist country <strong>to</strong> have a foreign market<br />

is not determined at all by the laws <strong>of</strong> the realisation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

social product (and <strong>of</strong> surplus-value in particular), but,<br />

firstly, by the fact that capitalism makes its appearance only<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> widely developed commodity circulation,<br />

which transcends the limits <strong>of</strong> the state. It is therefore impossible<br />

<strong>to</strong> conceive a capitalist nation without foreign trade,<br />

nor is there any such nation.<br />

As the reader sees, this reason is <strong>of</strong> a his<strong>to</strong>rical order.<br />

And the Narodniks could not escape it with a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

threadbare phrases about “the impossibility <strong>of</strong> the capitalists<br />

consuming surplus-value.” Had they really wanted <strong>to</strong> raise<br />

the question <strong>of</strong> the foreign market, they would have had <strong>to</strong><br />

examine the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> foreign trade, the<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> commodity circulation. And<br />

having examined this his<strong>to</strong>ry, they could not have, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

depicted capitalism as a casual deviation from the path.<br />

Secondly, the conformity between the separate parts <strong>of</strong><br />

social production (in terms <strong>of</strong> value and in their natural<br />

form) which was necessarily assumed by the theory <strong>of</strong> the<br />

* Mr. very correctly observes in the above-quoted<br />

book: “Till now the cot<strong>to</strong>n industry, which supplies the peasant<br />

market, has been growing steadily, so that the absolute diminution<br />

conceivable only theoretically” (pp, 214-215).<br />

** <strong>Vol</strong>gin, The Substantiation <strong>of</strong> Narodism in the <strong>Works</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Mr. Vorontsov, St. Petersburg, 1896, pp. 71-76. 39<br />

Bulgakov<br />

<strong>of</strong> popular consumption. . .” (which Mr. N.—on talks about) “. . .is<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!