22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM IN RUSSIA<br />

413<br />

with systematic division <strong>of</strong> labour.* It is interesting <strong>to</strong> note<br />

at this point the changes that <strong>to</strong>ok place in the organisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this industry between 1879 and 1895 (see Moscow Zemstvo<br />

publication: The Brush Industry According <strong>to</strong> the Investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1895). Some well-<strong>to</strong>-do industrialists went <strong>to</strong><br />

Moscow <strong>to</strong> carry on the industry there. The number <strong>of</strong> industrialists<br />

increased 70%, the increase being particularly large<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> women (# 170%) and girls (# 159%).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> big workshops with wage-workers diminished:<br />

the proportion <strong>of</strong> establishments with wage-workers<br />

dropped from 62% <strong>to</strong> 39%. This was due <strong>to</strong> the fact that the<br />

masters began <strong>to</strong> distribute work <strong>to</strong> be done in the home.<br />

The introduction in<strong>to</strong> general use <strong>of</strong> the drilling machine<br />

(for making holes in brush blocks) accelerated and facilitated<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the main processes in brushmaking. The demand<br />

for “setters” (craftsmen who “set” bristle in the block) increased;<br />

and this operation, which became increasingly specialised,<br />

fell <strong>to</strong> the lot <strong>of</strong> women, their labour being cheaper.<br />

The women began <strong>to</strong> work at home setting bristle, and were<br />

paid by the piece. Thus, the growing resort <strong>to</strong> domestic<br />

industry was caused in this case by progress in technique<br />

(drilling machine), progress in division <strong>of</strong> labour (the women<br />

do nothing but set bristle), and progress in capitalist exploitation<br />

(the labour <strong>of</strong> women and girls being cheaper). This<br />

example shows very clearly that domestic industry by no<br />

means eliminates the concept <strong>of</strong> capitalist manufacture,<br />

but, on the contrary, is sometimes even a sign <strong>of</strong> its<br />

further development.<br />

7) T h e P r o c e s s i n g o f M i n e r a l P r o d u c t s<br />

In the section relating <strong>to</strong> ceramics we get an example<br />

<strong>of</strong> capitalist manufacture in the industries <strong>of</strong> the Gzhel<br />

district (an area <strong>of</strong> 25 villages Bronnitsi and Bogorodskoye<br />

uyezds, Moscow Gubernia). The relevant statistics are given<br />

in our table <strong>of</strong> small industries (Appendix I <strong>to</strong> Chapter V,<br />

Industries Nos. 15, 28 and 37). <strong>From</strong> these data it is evident<br />

* The “sawyer” saws the brush blocks; the “borer” bores holes in<br />

them; the “cleaner” cleans the bristle; the “setter” “sets” the bristle;<br />

the “joiner” glues wooden strips on the brush backs (Statistical Returns<br />

for Moscow Gubernia, <strong>Vol</strong>. VI, Pt. I, p. 18).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!