22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

and reduction <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> workers, animals, etc., per<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> crop area, in the case <strong>of</strong> lives<strong>to</strong>ck or industrialcrop<br />

farming, with the adoption <strong>of</strong> intensive agriculture,<br />

this same progress may find expression, for example, in the<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> root crops, which require more workers per<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> crop area, or in the acquisition <strong>of</strong> dairy cattle, the<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> fodder grasses, etc., etc.<br />

The description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>p group <strong>of</strong> the peasantry must<br />

be supplemented by indicating the considerable employment<br />

<strong>of</strong> wage-labour. Here are the data for the three uyezds <strong>of</strong><br />

Taurida Gubernia:<br />

Groups <strong>of</strong> households<br />

Percentage Proportion (%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> farms<strong>of</strong> crop area<br />

employing belonging<br />

workers<strong>to</strong> each group<br />

I. Cultivating no land . . . . . . 3.8 —<br />

II. ” up <strong>to</strong> 5 dess. . . . 2.5 2<br />

III. ” 5 <strong>to</strong> 10 ” . . . . 2.6 10<br />

IV. ” 10 <strong>to</strong> 25 ” . . . . 8.7 38<br />

V. ” 25 <strong>to</strong> 50 ” . . . . 34.7 34<br />

VI. ” over 50 ” . . . . 64.1 16<br />

Total . . . . . . . . . . . 12.9 100<br />

Mr. V. V., in the above-mentioned article, argued about<br />

this question as follows: he <strong>to</strong>ok the farms employing workers<br />

as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> peasant farms<br />

and arrived at the conclusion that “the number <strong>of</strong> peasants<br />

resorting <strong>to</strong> hired labour for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> the land, as<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> the aggregate mass <strong>of</strong> the people, is quite insignificant:<br />

2 <strong>to</strong> 3, a maximum <strong>of</strong> 5 peasant farmers out <strong>of</strong> 100<br />

are all that represent peasant capitalism . . . it” (peasant<br />

farming in Russia employing labourers) “is not a system<br />

firmly rooted in contemporary economic life, but something<br />

fortui<strong>to</strong>us, such as occurred 100 and 200 years ago” (Vestnik<br />

Yevropy, 1884, No. 7, p. 332). What sense is there in comparing<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> farms employing workers with the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> “peasant” farms, when the latter figure<br />

also includes the plots <strong>of</strong> farm labourers? Why, by this<br />

method one could also get rid <strong>of</strong> capitalism in Russian<br />

industry: one would only need <strong>to</strong> take the families engaging<br />

in industries who employ wage-workers (i.e., the families<br />

{<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!