22.12.2012 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 3 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

354<br />

V. I. LENIN<br />

establishments in 7 industries we get the following picture<br />

<strong>of</strong> the relations between the small and big establishments.*<br />

Establishments<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> establishments<br />

family<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> workers<br />

hired<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal<br />

Gross income Wages Net Income<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal<br />

per<br />

worker<br />

RublesRublesRubles<br />

All establishments<br />

735 1,587 837 2,424 239,837 98.9 28,985 34.5 69,027 43<br />

Big ones53 65 366 401 117,870 293 16,215 48.2 22,529 346<br />

The rest 682 1,522 501 2,023 121,967 60.2 12,770 25.4 46,498 30.5<br />

An insignificant number <strong>of</strong> big establishments (less than<br />

0 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number), which employ about 5 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> workers, account for almost half the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

output and nearly e <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal income (combining the<br />

workers’ wages and the employers’ incomes). The small<br />

proprie<strong>to</strong>rs obtain a net income considerably below the<br />

wages <strong>of</strong> the hired workers employed in the big establishments;<br />

elsewhere we have shown in detail that this<br />

phenomenon is no exception but is a general rule for small<br />

peasant industries.**<br />

* See our Studies, p. 153 and foll. (see present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 2,<br />

The Handicraft Census <strong>of</strong> 1894-95 in Perm Gubernia.—Ed.) where data<br />

are given for each industry separately. Let us note that all these data<br />

refer <strong>to</strong> handicraftsmen cultiva<strong>to</strong>rs who work for the market.<br />

** <strong>From</strong> the data given in the text it can be seen that in the small<br />

peasant industries a tremendous, and even predominant, part is<br />

played by establishments with an output exceeding 1,000 rubles.<br />

Let us recall that in our <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics establishments <strong>of</strong> this kind<br />

have always been, and still are, classed among “fac<strong>to</strong>ries and works”<br />

[cf. Studies, pp. 267 and 270 (see present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 4, “On the<br />

Question <strong>of</strong> Our Fac<strong>to</strong>ry Statistics.”—Ed.) and Chapter VII, §II].<br />

Thus, if we thought it permissible for an economist <strong>to</strong> use the current,<br />

traditional terminology beyond which our Narodniks have never gone,<br />

we would be entitled <strong>to</strong> establish the following “law”: among peasant,<br />

“handicraft” establishments a predominant part is played by “fac<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

and works,” not included in <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics because <strong>of</strong> their<br />

unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry nature.<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal<br />

per wageworker<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal<br />

per family<br />

worker

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!