06.04.2013 Views

Gjuhësi Ballkanike

Gjuhësi Ballkanike

Gjuhësi Ballkanike

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

http://www.dielli.net<br />

Chapter VIII<br />

The Redoubling of the Objects<br />

This syntactic phenomenon developed in all the Balkan languages, particularly in Albanian and<br />

Macedonian, has been generally considered as a balcanism as well, although it is encountered<br />

also in some western Romance languages.(1). In current Albanian the redoubling of the direct<br />

object has become a generalized phenomenon only when it is expressed by a personal pronoun<br />

of the first two persons, representing the rheme of the communication or making part of it. Such<br />

a phenomenon appears likewise in the deeds of the Albanian ancient authors, particularly by<br />

Budi. In this function it is not conditioned by its position before or after the predicate. (2). But<br />

when it is expressed by other words, i.e. not by the personal pronouns of the first two persons,<br />

the redoubling of the direct object takes place only when it represents the theme of the<br />

communiacation or is a part of it. The same situation appears also in the deeds of the ancient<br />

Albanian authors. (3). The redoubling of the indirect object, too, has become a generalized<br />

phenomenon in current Alanian, when it is expressed by the personal pronouns of the first two<br />

persons, representing the rheme of the communication. In other cases it is redoubled not only<br />

when it represents the rheme, but also the theme of the communication (see the Albanian<br />

version). In both cases the redoubling takes place independently of the position of the object<br />

before or after the predicate. In the deeds of the ancient authors, particularly by Buzuku, the<br />

redoubling of the indirect object is not so frequent as in current Albannian.(4).<br />

The situation exposed in && 2-4 represents the further evolution of a syntactic phenomenon<br />

that had begun since the preliterary period of Albanian. It goes without saying that in more<br />

ancient times the opposition rheme ~ theme was realized by other means (see the Albanian<br />

version).(5).<br />

The main factor accounting for the redoubling of the objects expressed by a personal pronoun of<br />

the first two persons has obviously been the aim of the speaker to render more evident these<br />

chief complementing terms of the predicate, when they represented the rheme of the<br />

communication, or made part of it. It is more likely that such a phenomenon has originally<br />

occurred in sentences, in which the object, on account of emphasis, was placed at the outset.<br />

One cannot, however, rule out the possibility that in some cases the unstressed form should have<br />

anticipated the stressed one. At any rate, this phenomenon in both cases has developed since<br />

early.(6).<br />

The redoubling of the objects by the unstressed pronominal forms of the third person is still<br />

more difficult to be historically explained. It is to be presumed that in such cases the redoubling<br />

of the objects has originally taken place in sentences, in which they represented the theme of the<br />

communication. The chief factor of the redoubling then should have been the desire of the<br />

speaker to render more concrete the indefinite semantic content of the unstressed forms of the<br />

third person of the personal pronouns. At any rate, in this case, too, the question is of a<br />

relatively ancient tendency of the Albanian language to use redundant linguistic means<br />

whenever it was necessary.(7).<br />

The redoubling of the objects expressed by the first two persons of the personal pronouns has<br />

taken place, most probably, somewhat earlier. In such a case, one should not exclude the<br />

possibility that it may have exerted a cartain influence upon the redoubling of the objects<br />

expressed by the unstressed forms of the personal pronouns of the third person.(8).<br />

In Rumanian, too, the redoubling of the objects expressed by the first two persons of the<br />

personal pronouns has become a generalized phenomenon, independently of their position<br />

before or after the verb. In the remaining cases, the redoubling of the objects may be either<br />

obligatory, or facultative, or impossible. It is to be emphasized that the redoubling of the<br />

indirect object in Rumanian has not been generalized, as in Albanian. It seems that the main<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!