Euroopa varjupaiga- piiri- ja sisserändeõiguse käsiraamat
1p7iVcP
1p7iVcP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Kohtuas<strong>ja</strong>de loetelu<br />
P.I. vs. Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid, C-348/09, 22. mai 2012.................59, 85<br />
Petar Aladzhov vs. Zamestnik director na Stolichna direktsia na<br />
vatreshnite raboti kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti, C-434/10,<br />
17. november 2011............................................................................................................................85<br />
Pilar Allué <strong>ja</strong> Carmel Mary Coonan jt vs. Università degli studi di Venezia<br />
<strong>ja</strong> Università degli studi di Parma, liidetud kohtuas<strong>ja</strong>d C-259/91,<br />
C-331/91 <strong>ja</strong> C-332/91, 2. august 1993......................................................................................181<br />
Rahmanian Koushkaki vs. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C-84/12,<br />
19. detsember 2013..........................................................................................................................27<br />
Roland Rutili vs. Ministre de L’interieur, kohtuasi C-36/75, 28. oktoober 1985....................86<br />
Rottmann vs. Freistaat Bayern, C-135/08, 2. märts 2010.....................................................40, 54<br />
Ruiz Zambrano vs. Office national de l’emploi (ONEM), C-34/09,<br />
8. märts 2011.............................................................................................................40, 86, 110, 117<br />
Samba Diouf vs. Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration,<br />
C-69/10, 28. juuli 2011......................................................................................................................95<br />
Secretary of State for the Home Department vs. Rahman jt, C-83/11,<br />
5. september 2012.................................................................................................................115, 122<br />
Servet Kamberaj vs. Istituto per l’Edilizia sociale della Provincia autonoma<br />
di Bolzano (IPES) jt, C-571/10, 24. aprill 2012.........................................................................195<br />
Shirley McCarthy vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department,<br />
C-434/09, 5. mai 2011....................................................................................................................117<br />
Staatssecretaris van Justitie vs. Mangat Singh, C-502/10, 18. oktoober 2012.....................48<br />
Staatssecretaris van Justitie vs. Tayfun Kahveci <strong>ja</strong> Osman Inan, liidetud<br />
kohtuas<strong>ja</strong>d C-7/10 <strong>ja</strong> C-9/10, 29. märts 2012............................................................................52<br />
Süleyman Eker vs. Land Baden-Wüttemberg, C-386/95, 29. mai 1997...............................183<br />
Tetik vs. Land Berlin, C-171/95, 23. <strong>ja</strong>anuar 1997.................................................................52, 183<br />
The Queen, on the application of MA jt vs. Secretary of State for the<br />
Home Department, C-648/11, 6. juuni 2013................................................................ 207, 210<br />
The Queen, on the application of Yvonne Watts v. Bedford Primary Care<br />
Trust <strong>ja</strong> Secretary of State for Health, C-372/04, 16. mai 2006........................................198<br />
The Queen, Veli Tum <strong>ja</strong> Mehmet Dari,vs. Secretary of State for the Home<br />
Department, C-16/05, 20. september 2007.......................................................................50, 51<br />
The Queen vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte<br />
Abdulnasir Savas, C-37/98, 11. mai 2000...................................................................................50<br />
The Queen vs. Immigration Appeal Tribunal <strong>ja</strong> Surinder Singh, ex parte<br />
Secretary of State for the Home Department, C-370/90, 17. juuli 1992........................116<br />
231