31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thinking Machines 117should cast identical twins in tales of jealousy and betrayal of truly gothicproportions. In fact, nothing happens. The spouse of one identical twinfeels no romantic attraction toward <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r twin. Love locks our feelingsin to ano<strong>the</strong>r person as that person, not as a kind of person, no matterhow narrow <strong>the</strong> kind.On March 10, 1988, someone bit off half <strong>the</strong> ear of Officer David J.Storton. No one doubts who did it: ei<strong>the</strong>r Shawn Blick, a twenty-oneyear-oldman living in Palo Alto, California, or Jonathan Blick, his identicaltwin bro<strong>the</strong>r. Both were scuffling with <strong>the</strong> officer, and one of <strong>the</strong>mbit off part of his ear. Both were charged with mayhem, attempted burglary,assaulting a police officer, and aggravated mayhem. The aggravatedmayhem charge, for <strong>the</strong> ear biting, carries a life sentence. Officer Stortontestified that one of <strong>the</strong> twins had short hair and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r long, andit was <strong>the</strong> long-haired man who bit him. Unfortunately, by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong>men surrendered three days later <strong>the</strong>y sported identical crew cuts andweren't talking. Their lawyers argued that nei<strong>the</strong>r one could be given <strong>the</strong>severe sentence for aggravated mayhem. For each bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is a reasonabledoubt as to whe<strong>the</strong>r he did it, because it could have been <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r. The argument is compelling because our sense of justice picks out<strong>the</strong> individual who did a deed, not <strong>the</strong> characteristics of that individual.Our obsession with individual personhood is not an inexplicablequirk, but probably evolved because every human being we meet, quiteapart from any property we can observe, is guaranteed to house anunreplicable collection of memories and desires owing to a uniqueembryological and biographical history. In Chapter 6, when we reverseengineer<strong>the</strong> sense of justice and <strong>the</strong> emotion of romantic love, we willsee that <strong>the</strong> mental act of registering individual persons is at <strong>the</strong> heart of<strong>the</strong>ir design.Human beings are not <strong>the</strong> only class of confusable individuals wehave to keep distinct; a shell game is ano<strong>the</strong>r real-life example. Manyanimals have to play shell games and thus keep track of individuals. Oneexample is <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r who has to track her offspring, which may looklike everyone else's but invisibly carries her genes. Ano<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> predatorof herding animals, who has to track one member of <strong>the</strong> herd, following<strong>the</strong> tag-in-<strong>the</strong>-swimming-pool strategy: if you're "It," don't switchquarries, giving everyone but yourself time to catch <strong>the</strong>ir breath. Whenzoologists in Kenya tried to make <strong>the</strong>ir data collection easier by colorcoding<strong>the</strong> horns of wildebeests <strong>the</strong>y had tranquilized, <strong>the</strong>y found thatno matter how carefully <strong>the</strong>y restored <strong>the</strong> marked animal to vigor before

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!