31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

612 | HOW THE MIND WORKSMiller, K. D., Keller, J. B., & Stryker, M. P. 1989. Ocular dominance column development:Analysis and simulation. Science, 245, 605-615.Millikan, R. 1984. Language, thought, and o<strong>the</strong>r biological categories. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.Mineka, S., & Cook, M. 1993. Mechanisms involved in <strong>the</strong> observational conditioning offear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 23—38.Minsky, M. 1985. The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Minsky, M., & Papert, S. 1988a. Perceptrons: Expanded edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress.Minsky, M., & Papert, S. 1988b. Epilogue: The new connectionism. In Minsky & Papert,1988a.Mitchell, M. 1996. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. In press. The evolution of sibling rivalry. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.Montello, D. R. 1995. <strong>How</strong> significant are cultural differences in spatial cognition? In A.U. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Spatial information <strong>the</strong>ory: A <strong>the</strong>oretical basis for GIS.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Moore, E. F. (Ed.) 1964. Sequential machines: Selected papers. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Morris, R. G. M. (Ed.) 1989. Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychologyand neurobiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. 1991. CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process <strong>the</strong>oryof infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164—181.Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. In press. Two mechanisms of face recognition:Evidence from a patient with visual object agnosia, journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.Mount, F. 1992. The subversive family: An alternative history of love and marriage. NewYork: Free Press.Mozer, M. 1991. The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press.Murphy, G. L. 1993. A rational <strong>the</strong>ory of concepts. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychologyof learning and motivation, Vol. 29. New York: Academic Press.Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. 1995. Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.N. E. Thing Enterprises. 1994. Magic Eye III: Visions: A new dimension in art. KansasCity: Andrews and McMeel.Nagel, T. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450.Nagell, K., Olguin, R., & Tomasello, M. 1993. Processes of social learning in <strong>the</strong> tool useof chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of ComparativePsychology, 107, 174—186.Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. 1995. Visual surface representation: A criticallink between lower-level and higher-level vision. In Kosslyn & Osherson, 1995.Navon, D. 1985. Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. Marin(Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Navon, D. 1989. The importance of being visible: On <strong>the</strong> role of attention in a mindviewed as an anarchic intelligence system. I: Basic tenets. European Journal of CognitivePsychology, 1, 191 -213.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!