31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 J HOW THE MIND WORKSone of <strong>the</strong> founding documents of <strong>the</strong> SSSM, and when <strong>the</strong> anthropologistDerek Freeman showed that she got <strong>the</strong> facts spectacularly wrong,<strong>the</strong> American Anthropological Association voted at its business meetingto denounce his finding as unscientific. In 1986, twenty social scientistsat a "Brain and Aggression" meeting drafted <strong>the</strong> Seville Statement onViolence, subsequently adopted by UNESCO and endorsed by several scientificorganizations. The statement claimed to "challenge a number ofalleged biological findings that have been used, even by some in our disciplines,to justify violence and war":It is scientifically incorrect to say that we have inherited a tendency tomake war from our animal ancestors.It is scientifically incorrect to say that war or any o<strong>the</strong>r violent behavioris genetically programmed into our human nature.It is scientifically incorrect to say that in <strong>the</strong> course of human evolution<strong>the</strong>re has been a selection for aggressive behavior more than foro<strong>the</strong>r kinds of behavior.It is scientifically incorrect to say that humans have a "violent brain."It is scientifically incorrect to say that war is caused by "instinct" orany single motivation. . . . We conclude that biology does not condemnhumanity to war, and that humanity can be freed from <strong>the</strong> bondage ofbiological pessimism and empowered with confidence to undertake <strong>the</strong>transformative tasks needed in <strong>the</strong> International Year of Peace and in <strong>the</strong>years to come.What moral certainty could have incited <strong>the</strong>se scholars to doctor quotations,censor ideas, attack <strong>the</strong> ideas' proponents ad hominem, smear<strong>the</strong>m with unwarranted associations to repugnant political movements,and mobilize powerful institutions to legislate what is correct and incorrect?The certainty comes from an opposition to three putative implicationsof an innate human nature.First, if <strong>the</strong> mind has an innate structure, different people (or differentclasses, sexes, and races) could have different innate structures. Thatwould justify discrimination and oppression.Second, if obnoxious behavior like aggression, war, rape, clannishness,and <strong>the</strong> pursuit of status and wealth are innate, that would make<strong>the</strong>m "natural" and hence good. And even if <strong>the</strong>y are deemed objectionable,<strong>the</strong>y are in <strong>the</strong> genes and cannot be changed, so attempts at socialreform are futile.Third, if behavior is caused by <strong>the</strong> genes, <strong>the</strong>n individuals cannot be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!