31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

274 J HOW THE MIND WORKSeven cars) have some of <strong>the</strong>se geometric features, <strong>the</strong> module will haveno choice but to analyze <strong>the</strong>m, even if <strong>the</strong>y are most useful for faces. Tocall a module a face-recognizer is not to say it can handle only faces; it isto say that it is optimized for <strong>the</strong> geometric features that distinguishfaces because <strong>the</strong> organism was selected in its evolutionary history for anability to recognize <strong>the</strong>m.The geon <strong>the</strong>ory is lovely, but is it true? Certainly not in its purest form,in which every object would get one description of its 3-D geometry,uncontaminated by <strong>the</strong> vagaries of vantage point. Most objects areopaque, with some surfaces obscuring o<strong>the</strong>rs. That makes it literallyimpossible to arrive at <strong>the</strong> same description of <strong>the</strong> object from every vantagepoint. For example, you can't know what <strong>the</strong> back of a house lookslike when you are standing in front of it. Marr got around <strong>the</strong> problem byignoring surfaces altoge<strong>the</strong>r and analyzing animals' shapes as if <strong>the</strong>y werebuilt out of pipe cleaners. Biederman's version concedes <strong>the</strong> problemand gives each object several geon models in <strong>the</strong> mental shape catalogue,one for each view required to reveal all its surfaces.But this concession opens <strong>the</strong> door to a completely different way ofdoing shape recognition. Why not go all <strong>the</strong> way and give each shape alarge number of memory files, one for every vantage point? Then <strong>the</strong> fileswouldn't need a fancy object-centered reference frame; <strong>the</strong>y could use<strong>the</strong> retinal coordinates available free in <strong>the</strong> 2 l h-D sketch, as long as <strong>the</strong>rewere enough files to cover all <strong>the</strong> angles of view. For many years this ideawas dismissed out of hand. If <strong>the</strong> continuum of viewing angles werechopped into one-degree differences, one would need forty thousandfiles for every object to cover <strong>the</strong>m all (and those are just to cover <strong>the</strong>viewing angles; <strong>the</strong>y don't embrace <strong>the</strong> viewing positions at which <strong>the</strong>object is not dead-center, or <strong>the</strong> different viewing distances). One cannotskimp by specifying a few views, like an architect's plan and elevation,because in principle any of <strong>the</strong> views might be crucial. (Simple proof:Imagine a shape consisting of a hollow sphere with a toy glued on <strong>the</strong>inside and a small hole drilled opposite it. Only by sighting <strong>the</strong> toyexactly through <strong>the</strong> hole can <strong>the</strong> entire shape be seen.) But recently <strong>the</strong>idea has made a comeback. By choosing views judiciously, and using apattern-associator neural network to interpolate between <strong>the</strong>m when an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!