31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

428 HOW THE MIND WORKSruthless instincts that are often mistakenly equated with Darwinism. InThe Godfa<strong>the</strong>r, Sollozzo says to Tom Hagen, "I don't like violence, Tom.I'm a businessman. Blood is a big expense." Even in <strong>the</strong> harshest competition,an intelligent organism must be a strategist, assessing whe<strong>the</strong>r itsgoals might best be served by retreat, conciliation, or living and lettinglive. As I explained in Chapter 5, it is genes, not organisms, that mustcompete or die; sometimes <strong>the</strong> genes' best strategy is to design organismsthat cooperate, and yes, even smile on <strong>the</strong>ir bro<strong>the</strong>r and love oneano<strong>the</strong>r. Natural selection does not forbid cooperation and generosity; itjust makes <strong>the</strong>m difficult engineering problems, like stereoscopic vision.The difficulty of building an organism to see in stereo has not preventednatural selection from installing stereo vision in humans, but we wouldnever have come to understand stereo if we thought it just came freewith having two eyes and failed to look for <strong>the</strong> sophisticated neural programsthat accomplish it. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> difficulty of building an organismto cooperate and be generous has not prevented natural selection frominstalling cooperation and generosity in humans, but we will neverunderstand <strong>the</strong>se capacities if we think <strong>the</strong>y just come free with living ingroups. The on-board computers of social organisms, especially ofhumans, should run sophisticated programs that assess <strong>the</strong> opportunitiesand risks at hand and compete or cooperate accordingly.The conflict of interest among <strong>the</strong> members of a species also does notcall for a conservative political agenda, as journalists and social scientistsoften fear. Some worry that if our motives put us into conflict with o<strong>the</strong>rs,exploitation and violence would be morally correct; since <strong>the</strong>y aredeplorable, conflict had better not be part of our nature. The reasoning,of course, is fallacious: nothing says that nature has to be nice, and whatpeople want to do is not necessarily what <strong>the</strong>y ought to do. O<strong>the</strong>rs worrythat if conflicting motives are inevitable, it would be futile to try toreduce violence and exploitation; our current social arrangements wouldbe <strong>the</strong> best one can hope for. But that does not follow ei<strong>the</strong>r. Amongmodern Western societies, homicide rates vary from 0.5 per million personsper year in Iceland in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century, to 10 inmost European countries at present, to 25 in Canada, to 100 in <strong>the</strong>United States and Brazil. There is plenty of room for practical measuresthat could reduce <strong>the</strong> murder rate before we are faced with <strong>the</strong> academicquestion of whe<strong>the</strong>r it can ever be reduced to zero. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re areways to reduce conflict o<strong>the</strong>r than to dream of a golden future of indiscriminatelove. People in all societies not only perpetrate violence but

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!