31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

312 HOW THE MIND WORKS<strong>the</strong> world. Crank up <strong>the</strong> microscope, and <strong>the</strong> boundaries turn to fuzz. Takea textbook example, "mo<strong>the</strong>r," a category with <strong>the</strong> seemingly straightforwarddefinition "female parent." Oh, yeah? What about surrogate mo<strong>the</strong>rs?Adoptive mo<strong>the</strong>rs? Foster mo<strong>the</strong>rs? Egg donors? Or take species. Aspecies, unlike <strong>the</strong> controversial larger categories like "fish," is supposed tohave a clear definition: usually, a population of organisms whose memberscan mate to form fertile offspring. But even that vaporizes under scrutiny.There are widely dispersed, gradually varying species in which an animalfrom <strong>the</strong> western edge of <strong>the</strong> range can mate with an animal from <strong>the</strong> center,and an animal from <strong>the</strong> center can mate with an animal from <strong>the</strong> east,but an animal from <strong>the</strong> west cannot mate with an animal from <strong>the</strong> east.The observations are interesting, but I think <strong>the</strong>y miss an importantpoint. Systems of rules are idealizations that abstract away from complicatingaspects of reality. They are never visible in pure form, but are noless real for all that. No one has ever actually sighted a triangle withoutthickness, a frictionless plane, a point mass, an ideal gas, or an infinite,randomly interbreeding population. That is not because <strong>the</strong>y are uselessfigments but because <strong>the</strong>y are masked by <strong>the</strong> complexity and finitenessof <strong>the</strong> world and by many layers of noise. The concept of "mo<strong>the</strong>r" is perfectlywell defined within a number of idealized <strong>the</strong>ories. In mammaliangenetics, a mo<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> source of <strong>the</strong> sex cell that always carries an Xchromosome. In evolutionary biology, she is <strong>the</strong> producer of <strong>the</strong> largergamete. In mammalian physiology, she is <strong>the</strong> site of prenatal growth andbirth; in genealogy, <strong>the</strong> immediate female ancestor; in some legal contexts,<strong>the</strong> guardian of <strong>the</strong> child and <strong>the</strong> spouse of <strong>the</strong> child's fa<strong>the</strong>r. Theomnibus concept "mo<strong>the</strong>r" depends on an idealization of <strong>the</strong> idealizationsin which all <strong>the</strong> systems pick out <strong>the</strong> same entities: <strong>the</strong> contributorof <strong>the</strong> egg nurtures <strong>the</strong> embryo, bears <strong>the</strong> offspring, raises it, and marries<strong>the</strong> sperm donor. Just as friction does not refute Newton, exotic disruptionsof <strong>the</strong> idealized alignment of genetics, physiology, and law do notmake "mo<strong>the</strong>r" any fuzzier within each of <strong>the</strong>se systems. Our <strong>the</strong>ories,both folk and scientific, can idealize away from <strong>the</strong> messiness of <strong>the</strong>world and lay bare its underlying causal forces.It's hard to read about <strong>the</strong> human mind's tendency to put things in boxesorganized around a stereotype without pondering <strong>the</strong> tragedy of racism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!