31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Revenge of <strong>the</strong> Nerds 167molecules, everything we have learned in biology has come from anunderstanding, implicit or explicit, that <strong>the</strong> organized complexity of anorganism is in <strong>the</strong> service of its survival and reproduction. This includeswhat we have learned about <strong>the</strong> nonadaptive by-products, because <strong>the</strong>ycan be found only in <strong>the</strong> course of a search for <strong>the</strong> adaptations. It is <strong>the</strong>bald claim that a feature is a lucky product of drift or of some poorlyunderstood dynamic that is untestable and post hoc.Often I have heard it said that animals are not well engineered afterall. Natural selection is hobbled by shortsightedness, <strong>the</strong> dead hand of<strong>the</strong> past, and crippling constraints on what kinds of structures are biologicallyand physically possible. Unlike a human engineer, selection isincapable of good design. Animals are clunking jalopies saddled withancestral junk and occasionally blunder into barely serviceable solutions.People are so eager to believe this claim that <strong>the</strong>y seldom think itthrough or check <strong>the</strong> facts. Where do we find this miraculous humanengineer who is not constrained by availability of parts, manufacturingpracticality, and <strong>the</strong> laws of physics? Of course, natural selection doesnot have <strong>the</strong> foresight of engineers, but that cuts both ways: it does nothave <strong>the</strong>ir mental blocks, impoverished imagination, or conformity tobourgeois sensibilities and ruling-class interests, ei<strong>the</strong>r. Guided only bywhat works, selection can home in on brilliant, creative solutions. Formillennia, biologists have discovered to <strong>the</strong>ir astonishment and delight<strong>the</strong> ingenious contrivances of <strong>the</strong> living world: <strong>the</strong> biomechanical perfectionof cheetahs, <strong>the</strong> infrared pinhole cameras of snakes, <strong>the</strong> sonar ofbats, <strong>the</strong> superglue of barnacles, <strong>the</strong> steel-strong silk of spiders, <strong>the</strong>dozens of grips of <strong>the</strong> human hand, <strong>the</strong> DNA repair machinery in allcomplex organisms. After all, entropy and more malevolent forces likepredators and parasites are constantly gnawing at an organism's right tolife and do not forgive slapdash engineering.And many of <strong>the</strong> examples of bad design in <strong>the</strong> animal kingdom turnout to be old spouses' tales. Take <strong>the</strong> remark in a book by a famous cognitivepsychologist that natural selection has been powerless to eliminate<strong>the</strong> wings of any bird, which is why penguins are stuck with wings eventhough <strong>the</strong>y cannot fly. Wrong twice. The moa had no trace of a wing, andpenguins do use <strong>the</strong>ir wings to fly—under water. Michael French makes<strong>the</strong> point in his engineering textbook using a more famous example:It is an old joke that a camel is a horse designed by a committee, a jokewhich does grave injustice to a splendid creature and altoge<strong>the</strong>r too

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!