31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

344 HOW THE MIND WORKS• This problem was given to sixty students and staff members at HarvardMedical School: "If a test to detect a disease whose prevalence is1/1000 has a false positive rate of 5%, what is <strong>the</strong> chance that a personfound to have a positive result actually has <strong>the</strong> disease, assuming youknow nothing about <strong>the</strong> person's symptoms or signs?" The most popularanswer was .95. The average answer was .56. The correct answer is .02,and only eighteen percent of <strong>the</strong> experts guessed it. The answer, accordingto Bayes' <strong>the</strong>orem, may be calculated as <strong>the</strong> prevalence or base rate(1/1000) times <strong>the</strong> test's sensitivity or hit rate (proportion of sick peoplewho test positive, presumably 1), divided by <strong>the</strong> overall incidence of positivetest results (<strong>the</strong> percentage of <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> test comes out positive,collapsing over sick and healthy people—that is, <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> sick peoplewho test positive, 1/1000 X 1, and <strong>the</strong> healthy people who test positive,999/1000 X .05). One bugaboo in <strong>the</strong> problem is that many peoplemisinterpret "false positive rate" as <strong>the</strong> proportion of positive results thatcome from healthy people, instead of interpreting it as <strong>the</strong> proportion ofhealthy people who test positive. But <strong>the</strong> biggest problem is that peopleignore <strong>the</strong> base rate (1/1000), which ought to have reminded <strong>the</strong>m that<strong>the</strong> disease is rare and hence improbable for a given patient even if <strong>the</strong>test comes out positive. (They apparently commit <strong>the</strong> fallacy thatbecause zebras make hoofbeats, hoofbeats imply zebras.) Surveys haveshown that many doctors needlessly terrify <strong>the</strong>ir patients who test positivefor a rare disease.• Try this: "Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright.She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned withissues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in antinucleardemonstrations. What is <strong>the</strong> probability that Linda is a bankteller?What is <strong>the</strong> probability that Linda is a bankteller and is active in<strong>the</strong> feminist movement?" People sometimes give a higher estimate to <strong>the</strong>probability that she is a feminist bankteller than to <strong>the</strong> probability thatshe is a bankteller. But it's impossible for "A and B" to be more likelythan "A" alone.When I presented <strong>the</strong>se findings in class, a student cried out, "I'mashamed for my species!" Many o<strong>the</strong>rs feel <strong>the</strong> disgrace, if not about<strong>the</strong>mselves, <strong>the</strong>n about <strong>the</strong> person in <strong>the</strong> street. Tversky, Kahneman,Gould, Piattelli-Palmarini, and many social psychologists have concludedthat <strong>the</strong> mind is not designed to grasp <strong>the</strong> laws of probability,even though <strong>the</strong> laws rule <strong>the</strong> universe. The brain can process limitedamounts of information, so instead of computing <strong>the</strong>orems it uses crude

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!