31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

310 | HOW THE MIND WORKSlogic, to derive some truths from o<strong>the</strong>rs; arithmetic, to predict <strong>the</strong> effectsof aggregating; biology, to reason about living things and <strong>the</strong>ir powers;kinship, to reason about relatedness and inheritance; and a \ variety ofsocial and legal rule systems. The bulk of this chapter explores thoseintuitive <strong>the</strong>ories. But first we must ask: when does <strong>the</strong> world allow <strong>the</strong>ories(scientific or intuitive) to work, and when does it force us all to fallback on fuzzy categories defined by similarity and stereotypes?Where do our fuzzy similarity clusters come from? Are <strong>the</strong>y just <strong>the</strong>parts of <strong>the</strong> world that we understand so poorly that <strong>the</strong> underlying lawsescape us? Or does <strong>the</strong> world really have fuzzy categories even in ourbest scientific understanding? The answer depends on what part of <strong>the</strong>world we look at. Ma<strong>the</strong>matics, physics, and chemistry trade in crisp categoriesthat obey <strong>the</strong>orems and laws, such as triangles and electrons. Butin any realm in which history plays a role, such as biology, members driftin and out of lawful categories over time, leaving <strong>the</strong>ir boundaries ragged.Some of <strong>the</strong> categories are definable, but o<strong>the</strong>rs really are fuzzy.Most biologists consider species to be lawful categories: <strong>the</strong>y are populationsthat have become reproductively isolated and adapted to <strong>the</strong>irlocal environment. Adaptation to a niche and inbreeding homogenize <strong>the</strong>population, so a species at a given time is a real category in <strong>the</strong> worldthat taxonomists can identify using well-defined criteria. But a highertaxonomic category, representing <strong>the</strong> descendants of an ancestralspecies, is not as well behaved. When <strong>the</strong> ancestral organisms dispersedand <strong>the</strong>ir descendants lost touch and adopted new homelands, <strong>the</strong> originalpretty picture became a palimpsest. Robins, penguins, and ostrichesshare some features, like fea<strong>the</strong>rs, because <strong>the</strong>y are great-great-grandchildrenof a single population adapted to flight. They differ becauseostriches are African and adapted to running and penguins are Antarcticand adapted to swimming. Flying, once a badge of all <strong>the</strong> birds, is nowmerely part of <strong>the</strong>ir stereotype.For birds, at least, <strong>the</strong>re is a kind of crisp biological category intowhich <strong>the</strong>y can be fitted: a clade, exactly one branch of <strong>the</strong> genealogicaltree of organisms. The branch represents <strong>the</strong> descendants of a singleancestral population. But not all of our familiar animal categories can bepegged onto one branch. Sometimes <strong>the</strong> descendants of a species

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!