31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Family Values 495cedes because he can seek his fortunes elsewhere or bide his time untilcircumstances are more propitious. When animals size each o<strong>the</strong>r up,<strong>the</strong>y evolve ways to exaggerate <strong>the</strong>ir size: ruffs, balloons, manes, bristling,rearing, and bellowing, whose low pitch shows off <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> resonatingcavity in <strong>the</strong> animal's body. If a fight is costly and a winner unpredictable,<strong>the</strong> faceoff may be decided by an arbitrary difference such aswho arrived first, in <strong>the</strong> same way that human rivals may settle a disputequickly by flipping a coin. If <strong>the</strong> animals are closely matched and <strong>the</strong>stakes are high enough (such as a harem), an all-out fight may ensue,sometimes to <strong>the</strong> death.If both creatures walk away, <strong>the</strong>y may remember <strong>the</strong> outcome and<strong>the</strong>reafter <strong>the</strong> loser will defer to <strong>the</strong> winner. When many animals in agroup spar or size one ano<strong>the</strong>r up in a round-robin, <strong>the</strong> outcome is a peckingorder, which correlates with <strong>the</strong> probability that each animal wouldwin an all-out duel. When <strong>the</strong> probabilities change—say, when a dominantanimal gets old or injured, or an underling gains in strength or experience—<strong>the</strong>underling may mount a challenge and <strong>the</strong> rankings maychange. In chimpanzees, dominance depends not only on fightingprowess but on political acumen: a pair in cahoots may depose a strongeranimal going it alone. Many group-living primates settle into two dominancehierarchies, one for each sex. The females compete for food; <strong>the</strong>males compete for females. Dominant males mate more often, bothbecause <strong>the</strong>y can shove o<strong>the</strong>r males out of <strong>the</strong> way and because <strong>the</strong>females prefer to mate with <strong>the</strong>m, if for no o<strong>the</strong>r reason than that a highrankingsex partner will tend to sire high-ranking sons, who will give <strong>the</strong>female more grandchildren than low-ranking sons.Humans don't have rigid pecking orders, but in all societies peoplerecognize a kind of dominance hierarchy, particularly among men. <strong>High</strong>rankingmen are deferred to, have a greater voice in group decisions,usually have a greater share of <strong>the</strong> group's resources, and always havemore wives, more lovers, and more affairs with o<strong>the</strong>r men's wives. Menstrive for rank, and achieve it in some ways that are familiar from zoologybooks and o<strong>the</strong>r ways that are uniquely human. Better fighters havehigher rank, and men who look like better fighters have higher rank.Sheer height is surprisingly potent in a species that calls itself <strong>the</strong> rationalanimal. The word for "leader" in most foraging societies is "big man,"and in fact <strong>the</strong> leaders usually are big men. In <strong>the</strong> United States, tallermen are hired more, are promoted more, earn more ($600 per inch inannual salary), and are elected president more: <strong>the</strong> taller candidate won

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!