31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Good Ideas 355The very same word, force, is being used literally and metaphorically,with a common thread of meaning that we easily appreciate. Sentencesabout motion and sentences about desire both allude to a billiard-balldynamics in which an agonist has an intrinsic tendency to motion or rest,and is opposed by a weaker or stronger antagonist, causing one or both tostop or proceed. It is <strong>the</strong> impetus <strong>the</strong>ory I discussed earlier in <strong>the</strong> chapter,<strong>the</strong> core of people's intuitive <strong>the</strong>ory of physics.Space and force pervade language. Many cognitive scientists (includingme) have concluded from <strong>the</strong>ir research on language that a handfulof concepts about places, paths, motions, agency, and causation underlie<strong>the</strong> literal or figurative meanings of tens of thousands of words and constructions,not only in English but in every o<strong>the</strong>r language that has beenstudied. The thought underlying <strong>the</strong> sentence Minnie gave <strong>the</strong> house toMary would be something like "Minnie cause [house go-possessionallyfrom Minnie to Mary]." These concepts and relations appear to be <strong>the</strong>vocabulary and syntax of mentalese, <strong>the</strong> language of thought. Because<strong>the</strong> language of thought is combinatorial, <strong>the</strong>se elementary concepts maybe combined into more and more complex ideas. The discovery of portionsof <strong>the</strong> vocabulary and syntax of mentalese is a vindication of Leibniz'"remarkable thought": "that a kind of alphabet of human thoughtscan be worked out and that everything can be discovered and judged bycomparison of <strong>the</strong> letters of this alphabet and an analysis of <strong>the</strong> wordsmade from <strong>the</strong>m." And <strong>the</strong> discovery that <strong>the</strong> elements of mentalese arebased on places and projectiles has implications for both where <strong>the</strong> languageof thought came from and how we put it to use in modern times.O<strong>the</strong>r primates may not think about stories, inheritances, meetings, andtraffic lights, but <strong>the</strong>y do think about rocks, sticks, and burrows. Evolutionarychange often works by copying body parts and tinkering with <strong>the</strong>copy. For example, insects' mouth parts are modified legs. A similarprocess may have given us our language of thought. Suppose ancestralcircuits for reasoning about space and force were copied, <strong>the</strong> copy's connectionsto <strong>the</strong> eyes and muscles were severed, and references to <strong>the</strong>physical world were bleached out. The circuits could serve as a scaffoldingwhose slots are filled with symbols for more abstract concerns likestates, possessions, ideas, and desires. The circuits would retain <strong>the</strong>ir

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!